Prosecutors Cite Family Financial Dispute in Shooting of Mayer Brown Partner
A dispute over family money allegedly led Stephen Shapiro's brother-in-law, John Gately III, to kill, prosecutors said.
August 16, 2018 at 04:40 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
John Gately III's dispute with his sister over financial matters led to the deadly shooting of his brother-in-law, Mayer Brown partner Stephen Shapiro, a prosecutor said at a Thursday bond hearing in a northern Chicago suburb.
Gately, 66, was charged Wednesday with first-degree murder and attempted murder. A state prosecutor said Thursday that the attempted murder charge was related to Gately's sister, Joan Gately Shapiro, who is also the wife of Stephen Shapiro, a nationally lauded appellate court advocate who launched Mayer Brown's U.S. Supreme Court practice and argued 30 times before the nation's highest court.
Gately and his siblings had been arguing for months over a living stipend that Joan provided him, according to Illinois prosecutors. Cook County Assistant State's Attorney Andreana Turano said that “family lawsuits were pending.” Joan Shapiro paid her brother's rent and provided him money for expenses, but she had recently told him she would “no longer just give him money,” Turano said.
On Sunday, Gately had driven through a wrought iron fence at the property of another sibling, Turano said, leading to an argument with his sisters who believed he had been drinking. On Monday night, the arguments culminated in a grisly crime scene after Gately drove just a few miles to the home of his sister Joan, 69, and her husband, 72.
Shapiro answered the door at 7:17 p.m., after a quiet dinner with his wife, Turano said. Gately asked to see Joan, but Shapiro rebuffed him, the prosecutor said. Gately responded by shooting Shapiro multiple times, Turano said.
“'Johnny, no,'” said Turano (video below) in describing Shapiro's reaction to Gately. The former Mayer Brown partner was found with two bullet wounds to his chest. One pierced his heart, Turano said.
Gately then entered the home and pointed a gun at his sister, the prosecutor said. “'I'm going to kill you,'” he said, according to Turano. But Gately's gun failed, and live .22 caliber rounds fell to the floor. As he attempted to fix his gun, Joan Shapiro fled the house, the prosecutor told the court. After Gately left the home, she called the police and her siblings to warn them.
During a standoff with a SWAT team unit at his apartment in nearby Winnetka, Illinois, Gately attempted to escape via a rope he had tied to a balcony, the prosecutor said. Police later recovered at least two weapons from his home. Neither was a .22 caliber handgun.
Gately, who remained expressionless during the prosecutor's account of his brother-in-law's death and his own subsequent arrest, was denied bail. The judge cited as reasons for doing so Gately's alleged attempts to escape the SWAT team and that he had parked his car facing the road and left it running when he approached the Shapiro home. Turano said the state could seek a life sentence. (Illinois abolished the death penalty in 2011.)
Michael Petro, a Chicago defense lawyer representing Gately, said after the hearing that his client would plead not guilty, and that he had been “surprised” to learn that Shapiro had died.
“He loves Joan, and he loved Stephen dearly,” Petro said.
After the hearing, Petro said he was not aware of the details behind the “family lawsuits” that the state said were pending related to the Gately family. But he said that Gately's mother “has assets” and that one of the siblings had been appointed to make financial decisions on behalf of her estate.
“There was some turmoil in the family,” Petro said. “There is a parent that is still alive and she has some assets. I think there was a lawsuit filed by one of the siblings regarding those assets, but I don't know any details other than that.”
Turano painted a picture of a man who had faced serious struggles in the past. She said Gately had faced at least two arrests for driving under the influence, a battery charge and two “domestic-related” assault charges, one of which included a weapon. In 2005, two family members sought restraining orders against him, Turano said. (On his Facebook profile, Gately posted a story on June 19 about living with depression, anxiety and panic attacks.)
Shapiro once served as U.S. deputy solicitor general during the Reagan administration. He is also credited with founding Mayer Brown's Supreme Court and appellate practice. In front of the country's highest court, Shapiro had argued 30 cases and personally briefed more than 200. His death on Monday led to an outpouring of shock and remembrances among the nation's appellate bar.
His last oral argument occurred less than three weeks ago at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. A memorial service for Shapiro will be held at 4 p.m. on Monday, Aug. 20, at Christ Church in Winnetka.
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
- 1A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 2Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 3State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 4Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 5Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250