Ex-Big Law Partner Greebel Gets 18 Months in Prison for Shkreli Fraud Scheme
Evan Greebel, a former partner at Kaye Scholer and Katten Muchin Rosenman, is headed to prison after working with disgraced pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli to defraud investors.
August 17, 2018 at 06:38 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Rejecting Evan Greebel's defense that he fell victim to “master manipulator” Martin Shkreli, a high-profile former pharmaceutical executive that once controlled a former client, a federal judge sentenced the former Big Law partner to 18 months in prison Friday.
In a hearing that stretched more than three-and-a-half hours, U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto of the Eastern District of New York said that Greebel, who was a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman when he represented Shkreli's pharmaceutical company Retrophin Inc., was an experienced and “highly intelligent” attorney who knew what he was getting into when he served as an adviser to Shkreli and his business interests.
“He is not reckless, he was not naive, he was not inexperienced,” Matsumoto said. “He was not led astray by a young, brash CEO.”
Greebel, 45, was practicing at Kaye Scholer at the time of his arrest in December 2015. He was mostly expressionless during the hearing and looking at the table in front of him, though while reading a brief written statement to the court prior to the sentence, he removed his glasses and wiped his eyes.
“I will regret every day of my life, the day I met Martin Shkreli,” he said.
Greebel was convicted last December of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit securities fraud when representing Retrophin; he received an 18-month sentence on each count, to run concurrently, and was ordered to pay more than $10.4 million in restitution to the San Diego-based company and forfeit $116,462.
Shkreli himself was found guilty of securities fraud in a separate trial last year and was subsequently sentenced to seven years in prison for his role in the fraud scheme.
Federal prosecutors said Shkreli and Greebel schemed to defraud Retrophin by using its assets to pay off Shkreli's debts to investors in hedge funds he created, MSMB Healthcare and MSMB Capital, through sham settlement and consulting agreements.
Greebel was also accused of working with Shkreli and others to manipulate the price and trading volume of Retrophin's stock.
Greebel's lawyers asked the judge to impose no jail time, arguing that probation was sufficient as he had already lost his law license and a prison sentence would harm his wife and children. His legal team also claimed that Greebel played a “minor” role in the conspiracies.
In arguments prior to the sentencing, Mylan Denerstein, a Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner and member of Greebel's defense team, argued that he was punished by the fact that he will likely be disbarred due to his felony convictions.
Gibson Dunn partner Reed Brodsky, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan who joined the firm five years ago, led the defense team for Greebel, who intends to appeal.
Prosecutors had urged a five-year prison sentence, contending that Greebel “embraced” his relationship with Shkreli and sought to profit from it by earning more at his law firms through his relationship with Shkreli. Prosecutors also claimed that Greebel abused his role as Retrophin's outside lawyer to gain board members' trust.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Alixandra Smith said Friday that the government recommended the sentence to send a message to the legal community about the consequences for an attorney who abuses their position and to “protect the public from corrupt lawyers.”
“The legal community is watching this case very closely,” said Smith, a former associate at Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Jenner & Block. “Leniency would send the wrong message.”
In a strongly worded statement, Richard Donoghue, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, said that Greebel's sentence “reinforces our message that attorneys who facilitate crimes will be held accountable for their actions.”
“Evan Greebel leveraged his legal training and the trust placed in him by Retrophin's board of directors to commit serious crimes, including the theft of millions of dollars in cash and stock from the very company he was hired to represent. In doing so, Greebel broke the law and violated the ethical duties he owed to his client,” Donoghue said.
In a letter to Matsumoto just two days before his sentencing, Greebel said he wanted to publicly apologize to his family, friends, former colleagues and clients.
“I can never repay the support and loyalty that each of them have shown me during this time. I am as humbled and grateful for it as I am ashamed and embarrassed to stand before them and the court as a convicted man,” Greebel wrote. “From the beginning of this case, it has sickened me that anyone would believe that I would act or conspire to harm a client in order to benefit either myself or anyone else. I am devastated and ashamed by my criminal conviction and this is a burden that I will carry with me for the rest of my life.”
Going forward, Greebel, a native of Scarsdale, New York, said he has been working with others in launching an in-patient drug and rehabilitation facility in the Catskills after seeing that many facilities are located in the West and southwestern regions of the country. He said the new facility will be open by summer or fall 2019.
“I am hopeful that I will be able to begin my future sooner rather than later,” Greebel said.
Just days before his sentencing, Matsumoto, in a 177-page decision, denied Greebel's request for an acquittal or to order a new trial.
“The jury reasonably concluded that Mr. Greebel conspired with Mr. Shkreli and [Retrophin CFO Marc Panoff] to commit wire fraud … by causing Retrophin to enter into the settlement and consulting agreements, with the specific intent of defrauding Retrophin of shares and funds in order to pay off and silence” hedge fund investors and “to protect Mr. Shkreli,” the judge wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
Why the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
‘How to Succeed as a Trial Lawyer’: Talking Shop With Author and Veteran Litigator Stewart Edelstein
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250