Papa John's Hit with Securities Class Action for Failing to Follow Its Own Ethics Policy
The former chairman and CEO of the pizza chain resigned after reportedly using a racial slur during a conference call, but the new class action suit said additional reports about Schnatter's behavior also show the company's public statements about its corporate ethics were false and misleading.
August 30, 2018 at 04:48 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A rash of negative publicity surrounding pizza chain Papa John's now-ousted founder and former board chairman John Schnatter has snowballed into a new securities class action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Thursday.
The suit alleges the company failed to follow through on its own publicly stated code of ethics and behavior policies over the course of the class period going back to 2014. More even than Schnatter's well-publicized use of a racial epithet during an investor call back in May, the suit points to a recent Forbes story that detailed allegations of sexual harassment and executive incompetence by Schnatter and those around him, including his successor as CEO, Steve Ritchie.
Schnatter resigned as chairman of the company's board on July 12, after it became public he had used a racial slur during a conference call in May. The suit notes that Papa John's price fell nearly 5 percent after news of the incident became public.
On top of this, the Forbes report that investors claim showed a long-term disconnect between Schnatter and the company's public statements that resulted in material misrepresentations that resulted in securities violations.
The story, reporting on Schnatter's actions over the years as the company's founder and past CEO, claims he created a toxic culture where workers were spied on and inappropriate sexual conduct resulted in two separate confidential settlements against Schnatter over his behavior.
The story also claims Schnatter installed loyalists, who were largely unqualified, who helped him keep in place a “bro” culture at the company. The article specifically names the company's current chief development officer Timothy O'Hern, a childhood friend of Schnatter's, and current CEO Ritchie. Criticisms of Ritchie's qualifications and management style in the article are noted specifically in the complaint, including allegations that Ritchie's actions and decisions were potentially detrimental to Papa John's business.
The suit notes that after the Forbes piece ran on July 19, the company's stock price took another hit of nearly 5 percent.
“As a result of defendants' wrongful acts and omissions, and the precipitous decline in the market value of Papa John's securities, plaintiff and other class members have suffered significant losses and damages,” the suit claims.
A spokeswoman for the pizza company said they were in the process of reviewing the suit, declining to comment further.
A spokesman for Schnatter's attorney, laser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro name attorney Patricia Glaser, declined to comment ahead of review of the complaint.
The suit, which alleges two counts of securities violations against the company, Schnatter, Ritchie, and Lance Tucker, Papa John's former CFO, was brought on behalf of an investor by Pomerantz partner Jeremy Lieberman. He also did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After Two Big Wins for Plaintiffs, a Defense Verdict for Infant Formula Makers
Litigators of the Week: King & Spalding Gets 2nd Circuit to Uphold 'All Natural' Win For Kind Bar Maker
How Overseeing Legal Operations Has Affected How Steve Mahieu of Kraft Heinz Looks at Litigation
Litigators of the Week: Proskauer Scores a Defense Win for Last Defendant Standing in Broiler Chicken Antitrust Suit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250