Daily Dicta: A Win for Free Press and Free Trade
Passing up a chance to erect a trade barrier with Canada and stick it to the newspaper industry too, the International Trade Commission on Wednesday voted unanimously to nix import duties on newsprint.
August 30, 2018 at 02:01 PM
7 minute read
This could have been ugly—a case before the federal government that offered both a chance to stick it to the press (a.k.a. the enemy of the people) and send a message to Canada with a trade barrier.
Pure Trump administration catnip, right?
And yet, all five members of the International Trade Commission on Wednesday said no. The bipartisan commissioners unanimously voted to stop collecting punitive duties on imports of Canadian uncoated groundwood paper—the stuff that newspapers are printed on—in a case involving a dozen major law firms.
Among the winners: Covington & Burling; Sidley Austin and Baker Hostetler. On the losing side: King & Spalding.
Still, the decision didn't exactly amount to the ITC thumbing its nose at politics. Both liberal and conservative members of Congress bombarded the agency with letters opposing the tariffs—because every state has newspapers, and those newspapers have complained bitterly about the added cost, which they can ill-afford.
“For the Douglas Budget, a local paper in Wyoming, 6 out of their 24 jobs—25 percent of the paper's employees—have been eliminated,” wrote Wyoming Senators John Barrasso and Mike Enzi and Rep. Liz Cheney. “We are told that the Douglas Budget may be forced to cut more jobs should the tariffs remain and their production costs continue to rise.”
The Connecticut delegation—not typically in sync with Wyoming—said almost the same thing. “Publications have confirmed that they are cutting staff and pages from their papers. Connecticut newspapers already operate with extremely small staffs and tight resources, and these tariffs could very well result in the closure of essential news outlets in our state.”
Trade wars aren't so easy after all.
The case was instigated by North Pacific Paper Company, represented by King & Spalding's Stephen Jones, Benjamin Bay and Elizabeth Owerbach. In August of 2017, the company petitioned the Department of Commerce and the ITC to impose antidumping and countervailing duties on U.S. imports of uncoated groundwood paper from Canada.
“Norpac's only motivation is to address and offset the very significant subsidies provided by the Canadian provincial governments, many of which are aimed at keeping Canadian mills operating and competitive,” the King & Spalding lawyers wrote in an ITC filing. Their client, they added, “does not receive government subsidies, and thus its only recourse is the trade remedy laws.”
Without relief, they warned, Canadian producers will “push prices downward to the detriment of the domestic UGW paper industry, causing mill closures, employee layoffs, and financial losses.”
In March, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross announced that his department had made a preliminary determination that Canadian paper mills were dumping newsprint, or selling it for less than fair market value. “President Trump made it clear from the beginning that we will vigorously administer our trade laws to provide U.S. industry with relief from unfair trade practices,” Ross said.
Commerce ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to start collecting cash deposits in anticipation of a final order. (In August, Commerce lowered the tariff slightly.)
But such duties are a two-step process. Commerce determines if there is dumping, and then the ITC decides if the dumped goods “materially injure, or threaten material injury to, the domestic industry.” Only after both agencies say yes is the antidumping order final.
The ITC balked.
The agency won't release its report explaining why until October 8, but briefs filed with the agency outline the anti-tariff arguments.
“This case presents the unique circumstance of a single minority participant in the domestic industry—the petitioner, North Pacific Paper Company—claiming that subject imports cause or threaten to cause material injury to the domestic industry,” wrote Sidley's Richard Weiner, Neil Ellis, Rajib Pal and Carys Golesworthy for Canada-based Catalyst Paper Corp.. “The remainder of the domestic industry—indeed, the vast majority—opposes the petition and has told the commission in no uncertain terms that subject imports do not cause or threaten to cause material injury.”
Why no unified industry front?
In part, because competition for newsprint is regional. “Newspapers in the east buy newsprint from eastern suppliers, while those in the west buy from western suppliers, a Covington team led by Shara Aranoff and Peter Lichtenbaum wrote in an ITC filing.
Norpac is located in Washington State, and “there is no economically viable scenario in which Norpac can sell significant newsprint tonnage to purchasers in the east. Due to high transportation costs, those purchasers are far more likely to close their doors or go digital than pick up Norpac as a long term supplier,” wrote the Covington team, which represents the News Media Alliance of about 2,000 newspapers as well as Canadian paper mill Kruger.
The bigger issue is a long-term decline in in demand, they said. The import duties will only “decimate the already struggling newspaper industry, permanently and significantly reducing demand for the domestic industry's production.”
Baker Hostetler's Elliot Feldman, John Burke Michael Snarr and Mark Lehnardt, who represent Resolute FP Canada Inc and Resolute FP US lnc., summed it up bluntly: “Norpac's narrative is not worth the paper upon which it was printed: prices went up, import volumes went down and market share stayed about the same.”
Other law firms involved in the case include Hogan Lovells for the Government of Ontario; White & Case for Irving Paper Limited; Steptoe &Johnson for Alberta Newsprint Company; Hughes Hubbard & Reed for the Government of Canada; Cassidy Levy Kent for Tembec Inc.; Morris, Manning & Martin for White Birch Paper; Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer for the Government of Alberta; Arent Fox for the Government of Quebec and Mowry & Grimson for Gannett Supply Corp.
Investigators are reportedly looking at whether fugitive Malaysian financier Jho Low arranged payments using laundered money to lawyers including Marc Kasowitz, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and King & Spalding partner Bobby Burchfield.
Emmet Flood, a former Williams & Connolly partner who left the firm to join Trump's legal team in May, is seen as the leading candidate to replace McGahn.
“The district court correctly recognized that the bank's 'sound business decision was to terminate regardless of race or age or ethnicity.'”
Judge Paul Crotty's “rush to certify a class once again” requires the Second Circuit's review of two issues, Goldman's lawyers from Sullivan & Cromwell argue.
In a rush to bring the blood thinner to market, drugmakers Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals skipped needed testing, plaintiffs counsel told a Philadelphia jury Wednesday.
There's mortifying … and then there's this.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
'Vision': Judge David Tatel on the Value of Oral Argument and Reading Drafts Aloud
Snell & Wilmer's Andrew Young and the Case of the FBI's Secret Encrypted Phone Company
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250