Judge Trims 'DC Rates' in Pittsburgh Employment Case
Attorneys from Washington, D.C., may not have secured all of the fees they were seeking, but they are still set to receive more than $2 million for handling a series of employment lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
September 20, 2018 at 03:59 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Attorneys from Washington, D.C., may not have secured all of the fees they were seeking, but they are still set to receive more than $2 million for handling a series of employment lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
U.S. District Judge Mark Kearney awarded $2.26 million in attorney fees to attorneys from D.C.-based Williams & Connolly and Pittsburgh-based The Employment Rights Group who handled the case Mozingo v. Oil States Energy Services. The litigation stems from claims by oil and gas workers that they were cheated out of overtime pay.
The employees' attorneys had asked the court to award $2.43 million for the litigation, which started out with lawsuits for 29 separate employees.
According to Kearney, attorney Zachary Warren, the lead lawyer for the plaintiffs, started his representation of the employees while working at The Employment Rights Group in Pittsburgh, but, after he joined Williams & Connolly, Warren continued to lead the litigation, and brought on four colleagues from the Washington firm to help him handle the litigation.
Although Kearney granted much of the attorneys' fee request, he declined to apply the hourly billing rates common to the D.C. area, and instead said billing rates more common to the Pittsburgh area would apply.
“We cannot simply accept Washington billing rates as being reasonable in Pittsburgh,” Kearney said. “The employees' counsel do not offer evidence allowing us to make this leap. Exercising considerable discretion, we base the reasonableness of hourly rates upon blended rates for attorneys in this community.”
According to Kearney, the lawsuit began after 29 employees of Oil States Energy Services LLC opted out of a 2015 class action settlement in Texas. The plaintiffs, which consisted of frac hands, grease operators and crane operators, contended that the energy company misclassified them as exempt from overtime laws.
The 29 plaintiffs, who filed suit in the Western District in early 2015, hired Pittsburgh lawyers from The Employment Rights Group, and the defendants hired attorneys from Texas.
Kearney said 14 plaintiffs settled their cases in mid-2016, and soon after Warren left The Employment Rights Group to join Williams & Connolly. Warren remained on the case, and brought four colleagues from the D.C. firm to help continue the litigation.
The cases were eventually tried in two groups, and juries found in favor of the employees in both.
Regarding the request for fees, Kearney said the $375 hourly rate that Warren requested was “fair and reasonable.” However, Kearney declined to apply higher rates for the attorneys from D.C., and said the hourly rate for partners should be $500, the rate for associates should be $300 and the rate for summer associates should be $145.
Although the energy company raised numerous additional challenges, Kearney dismissed much of those, saying instead that the court was “far more skeptical of vague time entries often imbedded in block billing, or billing by several lawyers on the same task.”
As a result, Kearney ended up deducting nearly $30,000 from the request for “vague entries.”
Warren declined to comment for the story. Jackson Lewis attorney William Davis, who is representing Oil States Energy Services, did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A $604.9M Trade Secrets Verdict With a Big Assist From a Juror Question
Litigators of the Week: A Reset in the Fight Over Nearly $2B in Bonds Issued by Venezuela's National Oil Company
How Kirkland & Ellis Litigators Became a National Brand in Oil and Gas
Dorsey & Whitney Hits Back Against Complaint Claiming Firm Dragged Its Feet on Malpractice Suit Against Fellow Big Firm
Trending Stories
- 1Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
- 2Deposing Former Mayor Bill de Blasio; Misrepresentations To Induce Investment: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 3Which Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
- 4Two Tesla Shareholder Cases in Del. Chancery Court Consolidated
- 5Your Opinion Matters: Annual Managing Partner Survey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250