Traumatized Content Moderators Sue Facebook Over Graphic Images
Facebook Inc.'s content moderators had to see videos and images of "child abuse, rape, torture, bestiality, beheadings, suicide, murder."
September 24, 2018 at 03:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
|
A class action alleges that Facebook Inc. fails to provide a safe workplace for content moderators who suffer from psychological trauma relating to their jobs of weeding out graphic content depicting child abuse, suicide and other violent events.
Filed in California's San Mateo Superior Court this past Friday, the lawsuit seeks to represent thousands of California residents who worked as content moderators for Facebook over the past three years and allegedly suffered from trauma after viewing thousands of videos and images of “child abuse, rape, torture, bestiality, beheadings, suicide, murder and other forms of extreme violence.”
Also named in the suit is Pro Unlimited Inc., the Boca Raton, Florida, company that employed the content moderators bringing suit. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and a medical monitoring fund to help pay for “baseline tests and diagnostic examinations” to help diagnose post-traumatic stress disorder and other health effects.
“It is well-documented that repeated exposure to such images can have a profoundly negative effect on the viewer,” said Korey Nelson, plaintiffs' attorney from Burns Charest, in a statement. “Facebook is ignoring its duty to provide a safe workplace and instead creating a revolving door of contractors who are irreparably traumatized by what they witnessed on the job.” Burns Charest filed the suit along with the Joseph Saveri Law Firm in San Francisco.
Facebook spokesman Bertie Thomson said in an emailed statement: “We are currently reviewing this claim. We recognize that this work can often be difficult. That is why we take the support of our content moderators incredibly seriously, starting with their training, the benefits they receive, and ensuring that every person reviewing Facebook content is offered psychological support and wellness resources. Facebook employees receive these in house and we also require companies that we partner with for content review to provide resources and psychological support, including onsite counseling, available at the location where the plaintiff worked, and other wellness resources like relaxation areas at many of our larger facilities.”
Selena Scola, the plaintiff in the lawsuit, claimed she worked as a public content contractor at Facebook in Menlo Park and Mountain View from June 2017 to March 2018. She is one of 7,500 content moderators worldwide that filter Facebook's site.
“From her cubicle in Facebook's Silicon Valley offices, Ms. Scola witnessed thousands of acts of extreme and graphic violence,” the complaint said. “As a result of constant and unmitigated exposure to highly toxic and extremely disturbing images at the workplace, Ms. Scola developed and suffers from significant psychological trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder ('PTSD').”
Her complaint said Facebook receives more than 1 million user reports of objectionable content every day. Many reports are filed over images on Facebook Live, which has allowed people to livestream “murder, beheadings, torture, and even their own suicides,” the complaint said.
But Facebook has failed to follow industry safety standards, some of which it helped draft, such as altering the image so that it's blurred, in black and white, smaller, or without audio. Other internet service providers also have mandatory psychological counseling for content moderators and psychological assessments for job applicants.
“Facebook does not provide its content moderators with sufficient training or implement the safety standards it helped develop,” the complaint said. “Facebook content moderators review thousands of trauma-inducing images each day, with little training on how to handle the resulting distress.”
The complaint brings negligence and consumer fraud claims under California law.
Regarding the medical monitoring fund, Steven Williams, of the Joseph Saveri Law Firm in San Francisco, said in a statement: “Facebook needs to mitigate the harm to content moderators today and also take care of the people that have already been traumatized.”
In a footnote, Scola said she planned to amend her complaint with “additional and known allegations” of her experience that were left out of the lawsuit “out of an abundance of caution” due to a nondisclosure agreement she signed with Facebook.
The complaint references a 2017 article in The Guardian, in which one former Facebook content moderator said: “You'd go to work at 9 a.m. every morning, turn on your computer and watch someone have their head cut off. Every day, every minute, that's what you see. Heads being cut off.”
In 2016, two former workers at Microsoft who flagged child pornography, killings, bestiality and other videos at the software company sued for failing to provide them adequate mental health support.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 1High-flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
- 2Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
- 3Deposing Former Mayor Bill de Blasio; Misrepresentations To Induce Investment: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 4Which Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
- 5Two Tesla Shareholder Cases in Del. Chancery Court Consolidated
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250