Defiance and Deflection: The Kavanaugh Hearing, and What's Next
The Senate Judiciary Committee's still scheduled to vote Friday on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination, and he's already hired four law clerks for the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court term.
September 27, 2018 at 07:20 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, abandoning their silence in questioning the woman who has accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, heatedly defended their U.S. Supreme Court nominee, who said his family and reputation “have been permanently destroyed.”
What had been a relatively calm and nonpartisan morning session, where Christine Blasey Ford recounted her claim that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a party in the 1980s, erupted into partisan rancor between Republican and Democratic members.
Kavanaugh and the Republicans accused Democrats of a political hit-job. Democrats focused on the “quiet and raw” testimony from Ford, a research psychologist in California who testified for four hours and spoke about how the alleged attack affected her life.
The 21-member committee—11 Republicans, 10 Democrats—is expected to vote Friday morning on Kavanaugh's nomination to succeed Justice Anthony Kennedy. One key vote, Sen. Jeff Flake, the Arizona Republican, said in his allotted time that ”in the end there is likely to be as much doubt as certainty.”
If reported out of the judiciary committee, Kavanaugh's nomination is expected to move quickly to the floor. Senate Republican leaders were reportedly meeting Thursday evening to discuss the next steps. The Supreme Court term starts Oct. 1. Kavanaugh said Thursday that he had hired, on a contingent basis, four clerks—all female—for the upcoming term.
What follows are five highlights from Thursday's hearing.
➤➤ Kavanaugh refused to say whether he would ask, on his own, the Senate or the White House to get the FBI involved to investigate the misconduct claims. Democratic members have emphasized the lack of an FBI investigation to collect facts about the allegations and the refusal of Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, to ask President Donald Trump to direct the FBI to investigate the sexual misconduct allegations. During the hearing, Grassley insisted the FBI does not reach conclusions and make recommendations. Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Illinois, repeatedly tried to get Kavanaugh to personally embrace an FBI investigation. Durbin asked Kavanaugh to turn around and ask Donald McGahn, the White House counsel, to ask for an FBI investigation. Kavanaugh would not budge. He stuck to his line: “I welcome all the committee wants to do. I'm innocent. They [FBI] don't reach conclusions. I said I wanted a hearing.”
➤➤ Drinking was a central topic, and Kavanaugh wasn't eager to talk about it. Kavanaugh dodged and deflected and distanced himself from questions about how much he drank in high school and college. Alcohol was the element common to the three sexual misconduct allegations lodged against Kavanaugh. When pressed about his drinking in high school—the timeframe of Ford's sexual assault allegation—Kavanaugh said, “I like beer. Sometimes I had too many beers.” He denied ever drinking to the point of blacking out, passing out or not remembering where he was or what he did the night before. Kavanaugh was forced to apologize at one point after asking Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, about her drinking habits.
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
➤➤ Kavanaugh came out in fighting form. Kavanaugh was notably different at the hearing from his appearance Tuesday night on Fox TV. Gone was his calm plea for a fair process and in its place was an angry, defiant nominee who was dismissive and hostile at times to the Democratic senators pressing him. His demeanor reflected his comments in his opening statement in which he accused the “frenzy of the left” for turning the confirmation process into a “national disgrace.”
➤➤ Now, it's OK to talk politics and take sides. Just a few weeks ago, at the start of his confirmation hearing, Kavanaugh said repeatedly he would not touch anything remotely political. Judges, after all, are nonpartisan. That position went out the door Thursday. Kavanaugh inveighed against Democrats and activists, holding them responsible for drawing attention to the sexual assault claims lodged by Ford and other women. “This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons, and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups,” Kavanaugh said, in an extraordinarily political statement for a Supreme Court nominee. He added: “This is a circus.”
➤➤ Republicans ditched their outside counsel. During the first part of Thursday's hearing, when the committee addressed Ford, the Republican lawmakers on the panel ceded all their time for questioning to veteran sex-crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell. When it became time to interrogate Kavanaugh? Mitchell began to pinch-hit for Republicans, but soon dropped out. Republicans used their allotted time to defend Kavanaugh—mainly speaking out and asking few questions. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, spent five minutes railing against Democrats, and described the Kavanaugh controversy as “the most despicable thing I have seen in my time in politics.”
Read more:
Kavanaugh Angrily Calls Sexual Assault Claims a 'Political Hit'
Arizona Lawyer, Pinch-Hitting in Kavanaugh Hearing, Plays Prosecutor and Defense
Federal Judge Who Dated Kavanaugh Defends Character, Dismisses Anonymous Tip
'Uproarious Laughter' Haunts Ford From Alleged Kavanaugh Attack
Nearly 2,000 Female Lawyers Voice Support for Christine Blasey Ford
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250