After $250M Stock Sale, Burford Still Plans to Raise More Capital
Money keeps flowing into the litigation finance market, as Burford Capital announced a major share placement Tuesday.
October 02, 2018 at 12:56 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Burford Capital Ltd. raised $250 million this week by selling new shares on the London Stock Exchange, the publicly traded litigation finance company announced Tuesday.
But a quarter of a billion dollars will not put an end to Burford's capital cravings. The London-based litigation financier, which had a market cap of $5.4 billion as of Monday, said a debt issue and a private fund raise would follow “shortly.”
The new money, which Burford CEO Christopher Bogart said signals how strong demand is for the company's financing options, will be used to hire lawyers and business development team members in new markets, such as Australia, Germany and the U.S. cities where Burford does not yet have a physical presence.
“We're almost getting numb to the fact that just in one day we raised more than a quarter of a billion dollars, and the whole industry wasn't a quarter of a billion dollars 10 years ago,” Bogart said Tuesday. “Which really is a signal of how far this has come in a relatively short period of time. And obviously we're only raising this money if we're pretty confident about our ability to put it to work, which means we have clients out there wanting capital.”
The fast-growing Burford has been investing money at an increasingly fast pace.
The company announced in July that it had invested $540 million in new legal finance commitments during the first six months of the year. That was up 10 percent from the same time period last year and 170 percent more than the same period in 2016.
Burford has also been raising money more frequently since it purchased one of its largest competitors, Chicago-based Gerchen Keller Capital LLC, for $160 million in late 2016. Last year, Burford raised $500 million for a private fund and another £175 million in a bond issue. The broader litigation finance market has raised more than $1.5 billion since the end of 2016.
Bogart said his company will look to hire new members of its investment team—typically former Big Law litigators—in Australia, Germany and in potentially the U.S. states of Florida, Georgia or Texas. Bogart said Burford had hired more than a dozen people in the past three months and would continue to grow its head count at a similar pace.
“The market that interests us the most is the United States,” Bogart said. “Certainly Australia and Germany are places we're going to be expanding into. We're doing business there on a fly-in basis. But what this lets us do is continue to expand physically and geographically, so we'll put someone on the ground in Australia, but it also means we can put more people on the ground in the U.S.”
IMF Bentham Ltd., Burford's Australia-based competitor, also announced personnel moves on Tuesday. The publicly traded firm's board of directors will now include Christine Feldmanis, a veteran Australian banking professional who has held executive positions with Bankers Trust, Elders Finance, NSW TCorp and Treasury Group. IMF Bentham also announced that former Sidley Austin partner Peter Ostroff will have a permanent role on its U.S. investment committee.
Most of the shares Burford just issued, which were equivalent to 5 percent of the previously outstanding shares, were purchased by existing institutional investors.
“I think Burford has been performing well for investors, and they were supportive of expanding the equity base a little bit,” said Bogart, a former general counsel at Time Warner Inc. “As a capital structure matter, all this means is it provides us with a little more permanent capital and underpins the ability to take on more debt. We're keeping a very conservative balance sheet, while expanding it a fair bit.”
Shares of Burford were trading about 8 percent lower as of midday Tuesday in the U.S. Issuing equity often causes stock price dips, since it dilutes the value of outstanding shares.
Related Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
- 22 Carter Arnett Litigators to Join Baker & Hostetler in Dallas
- 3People in the News—Nov. 27, 2024—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
- 4Cybersecurity Special Section 2024
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Being Understanding, Fair and Impartial Are Key Requirements,' Says Gregory Noonan of Hogan Lovells
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250