Appellate Lawyers for Kavanaugh Stand by Their Man
With a final vote on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination looming, several appellate lawyers say they're still backing the U.S. Supreme Court nominee.
October 04, 2018 at 06:47 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Even as allegations of sexual misconduct have roiled Brett Kavanaugh's U.S. Supreme Court nomination, over a dozen appellate and Supreme Court attorneys who publicly supported him in an August letter have stuck by the nominee.
With the U.S. Senate expected to vote on Kavanaugh's nomination in the coming days, the National Law Journal reached out to around 40 lawyers this week, all of whom signed a letter of support to the Senate Judiciary Committee in late August.
Seventeen of the 41 lawyers who signed the letter said they continued to support Kavanaugh, even after the allegations against him surfaced. Two other prominent signatories—Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners Ted Olson and Helgi Walker—have publicly defended Kavanaugh. Twenty lawyers did not return requests for comment, and two declined to comment.
“I remain a strong supporter of Judge Kavanaugh and his nomination. … I have always known Judge Kavanaugh to be a person of integrity, fair-mindedness and kindness,” Allyson Ho, a partner in Gibson Dunn's Dallas office, said. Asked about the allegations, Ho added: “I certainly believe that women should be heard, that accusers should be heard and again I think others have said that and I would just reiterate my support for that.”
Kirkland & Ellis lawyer Paul Clement, who testified in favor of Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing, said Thursday that his position hasn't changed. Erin Murphy, a fellow Kirkland partner who signed the August letter, also indicated that her support has not wavered.
The more than 20 lawyers who did not return a request for comment include Arnold & Porter's Lisa Blatt, who formally introduced Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing. The hearing took place before the allegations against Kavanaugh arose, but her testimony and an opinion column, where she described herself as a “liberal feminist lawyer” who backed Kavanaugh, have drawn consternation from liberal legal crowds.
Blatt topped the signatures on the August letter praising Kavanaugh as “an outstanding jurist.”
“Based on our experience with Judge Kavanaugh and his work over 12 years of distinguished judicial service, we are confident that he possesses the character, temperament and intellect that will make him an asset to our Nation's highest Court,” the letter read.
A final vote on Kavanaugh's nomination could take place this weekend, with senators reviewing on Thursday an FBI file on its reopened background investigation of Kavanaugh. In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, the attorneys for Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her decades ago, asserted that the inquiry had “failed” to include interviews with Ford, and that the FBI declined to interview other witnesses.
As the sexual misconduct allegations have continued to rock Kavanaugh's nomination, a number of groups have spilled out in the last week to voice their opposition to his confirmation. As of Thursday afternoon, a group of over 1,700 law professors had signed onto a letter urging against his confirmation, citing “a lack of judicial temperament” during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week.
Nonetheless, Kavanaugh has found ample support in Washington's legal community, with a number of litigators who signed the late August letter sticking by the nominee. Some lawyers appeared to accept Kavanaugh's denial of the allegations.
Miguel Estrada, another Gibson Dunn partner, said he still supports Kavanaugh's nomination and stands by the letter.
“I used to be a federal prosecutor. I'm used to the evidence-based world. The accusations here range from the 'implausible and uncorroborated' however sincerely they may be believed by the accuser, to the preposterously outlandish,” Estrada said. “Quite apart from that, I have known Judge Kavanaugh for 26 years, and I know him incapable of the things he is being accused of. I fully believe his emphatic denial.”
Three other Gibson Dunn partners—in addition to Estrada, Walker, Olson, and Ho—voiced their support for Kavanaugh's nomination: Matthew McGill, Mark Perry and Amir Tayrani.
Richard Seamon, a professor at the University of Idaho's law school and a former colleague of Kavanaugh's in the U.S. Solicitor General's Office, said: “I always found him to be an upright, honest person and so I consider him to be highly credible. I have not seen or heard anything that alters that judgment.”
Latham & Watkins' Maureen Mahoney who testified in support of Kavanaugh said she remains “fully supportive of his nomination.” Roman Martinez, a colleague of Mahoney's and a former Kavanaugh clerk who signed a separate letter of support earlier this summer, also indicated there was “no change” to his support.
The other attorneys who told the National Law Journal this week that they continue to back Kavanaugh include: Consovoy McCarthy Park partners Jeffrey Harris, Will Consovoy and Tom McCarthy; Jones Day's Michael Carvin; Goodwin Procter's William Jay; Paul Larkin of the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center; and Quinn Emanuel's Chris Landau.
Read more:
As Partners Come Forward, Law Firms Walk Fine Line in Kavanaugh Controversy
The Justices Have Three Chances This Term to Bolster Arbitration
Ted Olson Is Fired Up Over ABA's Kavanaugh Letter, Drops Membership
900+ Law Profs Say Kavanaugh Lacks 'Judicial Temperament,' in Letter to Senate
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250