Litigation Funder Burford Sets Aside $50 Million for Women-Led Matters
With Burford Capital "sitting atop a pile of money," the company thinks it's found a new way to help close the legal industry's gender gap.
October 10, 2018 at 05:25 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
In a new twist on efforts to combat the gender gap in the legal industry, Burford Capital is launching an initiative that will earmark $50 million to fund women-led litigation matters.
The effort, which the New York-based litigation funding giant has dubbed The Equity Project, will use the funds exclusively to back commercial litigation and arbitration matters led by women, the company said Wednesday.
“Whoever holds the purse strings, holds the power at a law firm. That's how it works.” said Aviva Will, a former senior litigator at Cravath, Swaine & Moore who now serves as senior managing director of Burford's investment team.
“What this does is it puts the power of capital behind women to generate their own business for the firms, but also to incentivize the firms to put women in charge of big cases,” Will said.
Burford, which earlier this month announced it had raised an additional $250 million, has been collecting data on litigation matters for close to a decade. “One of things that we saw was that woeful number of opportunities to fund litigation matters that came to Burford were with cases that were being run by women,” said Will, a former assistant general counsel at Time Warner Inc.
Despite all of the initiatives and programs intended to bridge the gender gap, the legal industry was still moving at a painfully slow pace to parity, Will said.
So she thought, “what can I do, what can we do at Burford, sitting atop a pile of money [to] change the incentives, to change the economics to accelerate that pace of change?”
Under the new initiative, the $50 million pool will be used to fund litigation matters with women at the helm, she said. That can mean cases where a woman litigator is first chair; a woman chairs the plaintiffs' steering committee or serves as plaintiffs' lead counsel; a women-owned law firm is representing a client; a woman litigator earns origination credit; or where a woman partner is the client relationship manager. The funding opportunities are otherwise vetted just as Burford would assess any other litigation matter.
Burford, which was founded in 2009 by former Cravath litigator Christopher Bogart, currently has over $3 billion invested in various matters. Last year, the firm made a commitment of $1.3 billion and in the first half of 2018 has made new funding commitments of $540 million.
With capital from the initiative, female litigators and women-owned law firms can pitch clients and encourage women litigators at law firms to approach their management committees with new business using alternative fee arrangements.
“When we talked to women lawyers in the formation of this and thinking it through, a lot of what we heard was that woman are less likely to put themselves out there to go to a contingency committee and say, 'I've got this great case with this new client but we've got to take it on risk,'” Will said. “This kind of initiative allows them to use Burford's capital to take that risk.”
The Equity Project will also include a post-funding analysis of cases that it backs. And will have several backers in Big Law.
Dubbed “Equity Project Champions,” these corporate and law firm leaders will work to support and spread awareness around the initiative. They include Debevoise & Plimpton's Wendy Miles; Cravath partner and former U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York Katherine Forrest; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partners Nadine Herrmann, Tara Lee, and Sue Prevezer; Latham & Watkins global arbitration practice co-chairwoman Sophie Lamb; and King & Spalding partner Amy Frey.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
Why the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
Trending Stories
- 1Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
- 2Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 3Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 4Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 5Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250