Atlanta Lawyer Convicted on All Counts $26M Embezzlement Case
Federal jurors convicted the Atlanta lawyer on Friday of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, 21 counts of wire fraud and one count of making false statements to federally insured banks.
October 12, 2018 at 06:28 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
A federal jury has rejected Atlanta lawyer Nathan Hardwick IV's defense that the $26 million he took from his now-bankrupt, residential real estate closing firm, Morris Hardwick Schneider, were funds he thought legitimately due to him as the majority owner.
The 12 jurors convicted him on Friday of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, 21 counts of wire fraud and one count of making false statements to federally insured banks.
Jurors deliberated for nine hours over two days after 12 days of witness testimony in the embezzlement trial, held in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. There were two African-American men, seven African-American women and three white men on the jury. None was available for comment.
“We are very pleased with the jury's verdict today. It brings closure to my brother, Mark, our law partner Art Morris, and the rest of the firm's family,” said Hardwick's former partner Gerard Wittstadt.
“It was so unnecessary and sad to hurt over 800 people and their families for pure greed,” Morris said.
MHS personnel and Fidelity National Title's forensic accountants discovered millions in escrow account shortfalls for the Atlanta-based firm's closing operation, which Hardwick ran, in August 2014–ultimately totaling more than $30 million. Hardwick received $19.5 million alone from the firm's IOLTA accounts to pay bills to casinos and private jet companies—and to his personal holding company, Divot Holdings, which he used to pay women, creditors and other expenses.
The firm went bankrupt 11 months later.
“The past four years have been exceedingly difficult for all of us, as Mr. Hardwick caused personal destruction to good lawyers' reputations. I'd like to thank the court, the prosecutors, the U.S. Attorneys Office and the FBI for their diligence and hard work in bringing this matter to its final conclusion,” Wittstadt said.
“We'd like to thank Fidelity for its support in making sure that no citizens were harmed,” he added.
Fidelity National TItle poured almost $30 million into MHS's IOLTA accounts after the shortfalls were discovered in August 2014.
Hardwick testified on Oct. 9 that he thought the $26 million, which he asked the firm's then-controller, Asha Maurya, to disburse to him between 2011 and 2014, was coming from available cash in the firm's operating accounts, not its escrow accounts.
The prosecutors told the jury that MHS's equity partners were only supposed to get payouts from the firm's net income, which totaled just under $10 million from 2011 to 2013, according to the firm's audited financial statements.
Hardwick's lawyers from Garland, Samuel & Loeb told the jury that Maurya was the sole culprit, not Hardwick. Maurya, who has admitted taking almost $900,000 from MHS, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud conspiracy last year and is cooperating with the government, but prosecutors did not call her to testify.
Prosecutor J. Russell Phillips told Judge Eleanor Ross after the foreperson delivered the jury's verdict that the government would ask for a sentence of roughly 15 years.
Hardwick, 53, was taken into custody after the verdict.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
‘How to Succeed as a Trial Lawyer’: Talking Shop With Author and Veteran Litigator Stewart Edelstein
Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250