Global Arbitration Lawyers Flock to Saudi Arabian Conference Amidst Boycott
As "Davos in the Desert" dries up due to the controversy surrounding Jamal Khashoggi, international arbitration lawyers from around the world were scheduled to rub elbows with Saudi leadership at another conference down the road.
October 16, 2018 at 04:53 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Thanks to their decision to stay home, JPMorgan Chase's Jamie Dimon, Blackstone's Steve Schwarzman and BlackRock's Larry Fink have helped to make the Saudi government's so-called Davos in the Desert investment conference a household name.
Responding to the alleged murder of Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi, the CEOs and other media and tech luminaries announced they would not participate in next week's Future Investment Initiative in Riyadh.
But the Saudi Center of International Arbitration's first international conference—which featured a handful of arbitration leaders at top international firms along with members of the Saudi cabinet—managed to fly under the radar just down the road.
The timing of the event meant that lawyers from King & Spalding, Norton Rose Fulbright, White & Case and other firms, along with leadership from the American Arbitration Association, were scheduled to brush shoulders in Riyadh on Monday and Tuesday with a member of the Saudi royal family and multiple cabinet officials while questions swirled about whether Saudi agents had been sent to Turkey to kill and dismember the Washington Post columnist.
The list of speakers included Prince Dr. Abdulaziz bin Sattam al Saud, and the Saudi ministers of Labor and Social Development, Justice, and Commerce & Investment. They were to be joined by a list of arbitration experts from around the world including UAE-based King & Spalding partner Adrian Cole, Norton Rose Fulbright international arbitration global co-head Mark Baker, and White & Case international arbitration head Paul Friedland.
“It was an honor to speak on the topic of cross examination at the Saudi Center of Commercial Arbitration's first international conference,” Baker said in an email. “This important conference on international arbitration and mediation was attended by more than 750 ministers, academics and lawyers.”
Representatives of King & Spalding and White & Case did not respond to inquiries about whether their attorneys ultimately participated.
The list also featured AAA CEO India Johnson and general counsel Eric Tuchmann. An AAA representative also did not respond to an inquiry about their participation.
King & Spalding, Norton Rose Fulbright and White & Case are all among a short list of U.S.-based firms with substantial ties to Saudi Arabia. Saudi rules prevent international law firms from operating in the country without a local partner firm. King & Spalding's alliance dates to 2006, and Norton Rose Fulbright has been there since 2005. White & Case, which handles significant work for state-owned Saudi Aramco, arrived in 1989.
More recently, Mayer Brown and Hogan Lovells announced tie-ups in the country earlier this year.
Hogan Lovells is one of several U.S. firms that have also done U.S. lobbying work for Saudi Arabia in the last year. In June, senior counsel Norm Coleman, the former Minnesota Republican senator, signed an agreement with a $125,000 monthly retainer for the entirety of 2018.
In August, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner Theodore Olson agreed to put in time, including the preparation of an op-ed, opposing the proposed “No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act” for a flat fee of $250,000. The bill, which was introduced this year in the U.S. House of Representatives, would expose OPEC to U.S. prosecution for any antitrust violations.
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck also has an open lobbying relationship with the Kingdom, extending through the end of 2018, also at $125,000 monthly.
Representatives from all three firms did not respond to requests for comment.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTalking Shop About Faegre Drinker's New Arizona Design Lab with Trial Partner David 'DJ' Gross
How Do You Get Experience Leading an MDL Without Experience Leading an MDL?
Litigation Leaders: Quinn Emanuel's Michael Carlinsky on Training Associates to Think and Act Like Trial Lawyers
Leveling the Playing Field: Insights From Celebrated Women Legal Leaders
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250