Daily Dicta: Mintz Lawyers (Luxury) Expenses under the Microscope
Normally, what expenses a client will—or won't—pay for is a private matter between the law firm and the client. But this case is different.
November 01, 2018 at 12:03 PM
7 minute read
Private plane travel. A $1,200-a-night hotel suite. A “lavish retreat” to a Cape Cod resort.
Those are perks that lawyers from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo allegedly enjoyed, courtesy of Oxbow Carbon and its founder and CEO William Koch.
In the latest chapter of a bitter fight in Delaware Chancery Court, lawyers from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan are scrutinizing charges that Oxbow covered for Mintz Levin lawyers—including name partner and firm chairman R. Robert Popeo.
A Mintz Levin spokesman declined comment.
Normally, what expenses a client will—or won't—pay for is a private matter between the law firm and the client. But this case is different.
“I know—boy do I know—that there is no love lost between the principals in this action,” said Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster according to a transcript of a telephonic oral argument on Sept. 17.
On Aug. 1, Laster ruled that that Koch has to sell Oxbow Carbon so that two private equity firms can recoup their investment in the $2 billion energy company. The minority investors, who are represented by Quinn Emanuel, own one-third of the company. (For a deeper dive into the underlying case, see my prior coverage here.)
Of course, Laster's decision may not stand—Koch filed an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court last night. But if it does, up to $50 million in payments from Oxbow to Mintz Levin are directly relevant.
Koch (brother of GOP kingmakers Charles and David) originally hired Mintz Levin as his personal counsel. But he then “modified the firm's engagement letter so that Mintz Levin represented Oxbow. No satisfactory explanation was ever provided for this shift,” the judge wrote.
Mintz Levin was not an impartial corporate counsellor, Laster noted, writing that the firm took Koch's side in opposing the exit sale. Which meant the minority investors who sued to force the sale were, in effect, stuck paying for one-third of opposing counsel's fees. “The amount is not trivial,” Laster wrote.
As such, Laster ruled that the minority investors are “entitled to compensatory damages equal to their proportionate share of any amounts paid by or on behalf of Oxbow to Mintz Levin.”
In September, lawyers from Quinn Emanuel and Abrams & Bayliss filed a books-and-records complaint on behalf of minority investor Crestview Partners to identify alleged sources of corporate waste by Oxbow.
One target: private plane travel for Mintz Levin lawyers. In court papers filed last week, the Crestview lawyers said Oxbow spent more than $200,000 on such trips.
Oxbow initially denied the expenses, advising the court that “there are no records relating to private airplane travel because Oxbow has not paid for any such travel for Mintz or other attorneys involved in the underlying case,” according to the plaintiffs' motion.
Oxbow later admitted the company had actually financed private plane travel for the lawyers.
Popeo in an email to Koch dated Aug. 27, 2018 wrote that as the CEO was aware, there was a “period of time when Oxbow was reimbursing all its directors for private plane travel for its board meetings. Oxbow did cover similar costs for Mintz Levin attorneys to also attend board meetings on a couple of occasions.”
As for travel after June of 2016, Popeo continued, “Mintz Levin either underwrote its own private plane travel completely…or simply charged Oxbow what it would have cost to make the same trip with a commercial first-class ticket.”
It's a steep difference.
Invoices billed to Oxbow show, for example, that it cost $24,695.22 to fly Popeo and partner Breton Leone-Quick from Bedford, Massachusetts to West Palm Beach and back on Sept. 21 – 22, 2016.
By comparison, a roundtrip, first-class ticket next week on United from Boston to West Palm Beach would run about $1,000, based on an Expedia search.
Also at issue: Charges billed to Oxbow for a Mintz Levin retreat at Chatham Bars Inn (which looks lovely) on Cape Cod.
Mintz Levin said it was all a mix-up, and that a portion of the costs for the event were inadvertently invoiced to Oxbow.
The plaintiffs are skeptical. “While the company acknowledged the 'error' and Mintz pledged repayment, the company did not explain the cost of the error, how Mintz wrongly billed the company, or how Oxbow wrongly paid that bill. Oxbow also failed to explain how the cost for the retreat, which was incurred in 2017, had supposedly gone unnoticed for so long.”
Now, the Quinn Emanuel and Abrams & Bayliss lawyers want $60,000 in attorneys' fees (less than the “errant” expenditure on Mintz's Cape Cod retreat, they say). They argue it's compensation for the costs incurred as a result of Oxbow's “bad faith refusal to produce documents in response to plaintiffs' books-and-records demand and misrepresentations made by Oxbow to plaintiffs (and the court) in connection therewith.”
What I'm Reading
Tribes Sue North Dakota for Suppressing Right to Vote in Midterms
The complaint, filed on behalf of members of the Sioux Spirit Lake, Chippewa, and Cheyenne tribes, alleges that North Dakota's “unplanned, untested, and broken” law requiring voters to present identification at the polls to prove their current residential address poses “a severe impediment” to their constitutional right to vote.
Forfeiture Contract Complicates Quinn Emanuel Spat With Breakaway Partners
The Selendy & Gay partners signed partnership agreements requiring that, if they left Quinn Emanuel and brought their books of business with them, for an 18-month period they must pay a 10 percent share of legal fees collected from clients originated at their former employer.
Billionaire Ex-Client Can Retrieve File From Boies Schiller But Must Put Up $860K
Canadian billionaire Alex Shnaider can have a client file held by his former lawyers at Boies Schiller Flexner, but he'll first have to pony up $860,000 and place it in escrow because of an ongoing unpaid legal fees dispute, a New York judge has ruled.
Racial Discrimination Case Against Pep Boys Advances, but $7M Punitives Claim Tossed
Pep Boys argued that it cannot be held liable for the worker's alleged comments because, through its employee training programs, Pep Boys made good-faith efforts to avoid such behavior by its employees.
Justices Frown on Cy Pres Settlements, but Fate Is Uncertain
“How can you say this makes any sense?” Justice Samuel Alito Jr. asked at one point during the oral argument. “At the end of the day, what happens? The attorneys get money, and a lot of it. The class members get no money whatsoever.”
Texas Lawyer Beats Police at Fifth Circuit After Her Alleged False Arrest
It should have been a simple inquiry over a minor incident. But the police encounter with Connie Westfall, an environmental law partner at Clark Hill, escalated quickly.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShould It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250