Adidas and Reebok Sue Over Pirated Kanye West Designs
Sportswear giants Adidas and Reebok have filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida, accusing almost 200 online retailers of selling counterfeit sneakers and other sportswear, many of which were designed by rapper, producer and fashion designer Kanye West.
November 05, 2018 at 02:46 PM
4 minute read
Adidas and affiliate Reebok have filed a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit against 196 online retailers for allegedly flouting counterfeit versions of sportswear by rapper, producer and fashion designer Kanye West.
The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of Florida, doesn't call anyone a gold digger, but does name a long list of defendants over claims they earned “substantial profits” by promoting, selling and distributing fake or “confusingly similar” imitations of trademarked goods.
West is a Chicago rapper who rose to fame with hits like “Gold Digger,” “Heartless,” “No Church in the Wild” and “Jesus Walks.” He is married to reality television star and entrepreneur Kim Kardashian West.
This isn't the first time West's name has been “used” this year.
Following his unexpected political monologue opposite a bemused President Donald Trump in the Oval Office in October, West declared he was distancing himself from politics, claiming, ”I've been used to spread messages I don't believe in.” Before that, he had emerged as an unlikely Trump supporter. West said in that Oval Office meeting that wearing Trump's “ Make America Great Again” hat had made him feel like Superman. But he has since appeared to pledge allegiance to policies championed by former U.S. President Barack Obama.
But just as West stepped out of the political limelight, a new lawsuit by companies sponsoring his sports line focuses on the alleged misuse of the rapper's moniker.
Many of the alleged pirated products include footwear, sportswear and sports equipment, designed by West and sponsored by Adidas and Reebok. They're being sold online on dozens of websites that include West's nickname, “Yeezy,” in their titles.
According to the complaint, the defendants used West's “famous name” and the companies' widely recognized trademarks to “drive internet consumer traffic to their websites,” many of which ”harm” the brand's reputation in South Florida and beyond.
The plaintiffs span four countries, and include Adidas A.G. in Germany, Adidas International Marketing B.V. in the Netherlands, Adidas America Inc. in Oregon, Reebok International Ltd. in England, and Reebok International Ltd. in Massachusetts.
The lawsuit seeks $2 million from each defendant and $100,000 in statutory damages for every ”cybersquatted” domain name. It also requests that all “illegal” websites be shut down.
“Welcome to our online shop where you can enjoy a happy shopping, where you can experience the first-class after-sale service,” reads one defendants' homepage, 2017yeezy.com, which also appears to brandish Adidas' logo.
Another site, Okyeezy.com, sells a range of Adidas sneakers and also claims to have a “strong manufacture plant” and “excellent quality” products.
Some sites, like Buyfakeyeezys.com, are less subtle in name.
The defendants have no assigned attorneys and do not appear to have been served with the lawsuit as of press time.
Plaintiffs lawyers Stephen M. Gaffigan, Virgilio Gigante and T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez of Stephen M. Gaffigan in Fort Lauderdale did not respond to requests for comment before deadline.
Read the full complaint: [falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
The sale of counterfeit products, according to the complaint, has grown at an “exponential” rate.
“Plaintiffs suffer ongoing daily and sustained violations of their respective trademark rights at the hands of counterfeiters and infringers,” the complaint said.
The plaintiffs' list of registered trademarks date back to 1970 and range from sports gear to laptop covers, sandals and sunglasses. Sneakers endorsed or designed by NBA stars Michael Jordan and James Harden, and soccer legend David Beckham are also among those potentially affected.
Related stories:
Woman to Blame? Margaritaville Brand Fight Over Rights in Bahamas
What's Left to Argue? Florida, Texas Lawyers Fight Over Ad Slogan
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250