As Voter Suppression Fears Rise, Law Firms Step Up Election Volunteering
Dozens of big law firms are hosting call centers and making other efforts to protect voting rights in Tuesday's highly charged midterm elections.
November 05, 2018 at 03:23 PM
4 minute read
Amid worries that voting suppression efforts have intensified in the run-up to Tuesday's midterm elections, the national Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is counting on nearly 100 large law firms to ensure that citizens succeed at making their voices heard at the ballot box.
Big Law attorneys will be spreading out across the country to serve as poll monitors and will be manning hotline call centers to respond to concerns about ballot access. And, in the event of any “eleventh hour mischief,” some are prepared to initiate litigation in partnership with the organization's staff attorneys, said president and executive director Kristen Clarke.
“In all of the areas of the work that we do, it is perhaps here where we see corporate law firms really standing up and offering their resources to help fight back,” Clarke added. “It speaks to how central the right to vote is in our democracy.”
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law dates back to 1963, when President John F. Kennedy, Vice President Lyndon Johnson and Attorney General Robert Kennedy summoned nearly 250 private attorneys to the White House to support the civil rights fight. While the group's election protection program has been in place for 18 years, the significance of the effort has increased in recent years.
That owes to the U.S. Supreme Court's 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, which gutted provisions of the 1965 Voting Right Act that required certain states and localities to obtain federal pre-clearance before changing their voting laws and practices. Since then, Clarke says, discriminatory pressures on voting have moved forward at an “unrelenting pace.”
Those developments have prompted lawsuits around the country, pertaining both to states previously covered by the law's pre-clearance mandate and to new states. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, litigation regarding voting restrictions is currently unfolding in 17 states.
According to Clarke, in the current climate, more firms are committing pro bono resources to the issue. One notable example is in stepping up to host call centers. The organization largely hosts the national 866-OUR-VOTE hotline out of its own office, but Monday it moved to 18 sites around the country.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett expects over 230 volunteers at its call center in New York, according to partner John Ericson. Other call center hosts include Drinker Biddle & Reath in Washington, D.C., Reed Smith in Los Angeles and Kirkland & Ellis in Chicago, San Francisco and New York.
Dorsey & Whitney, which has been involved in the election protection project for over a decade, hosts a call center in Minneapolis that serves voters from Minnesota as well as Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Missouri, North Dakota and South Dakota, according to a spokeswoman for the firm. “This group's skill and dedication to protecting the franchise is inspiring,” partner Jonathan Van Horn said in a statement. “A few years ago, I assisted a first-time voter over several hours and several phone calls. His grandmother later sent me note that says it all: 'Hallelujah, he was finally allowed to cast his vote.'”
Other firms are getting their attorneys out of the office. Venable is sending a dozen lawyers from around the country to Ohio to serve as nonpartisan poll monitors in conjunction with the committee.
“This is the least we can do to insure that all eligible voters are allowed to vote if they make the effort to go to their polling stations,” partner William Coston said in a statement. “Lawyers have a special duty and privilege to help voters exercise their rights to pick their leaders.”
Steptoe & Johnson LLP, meanwhile, announced it will be providing all employees with two hours of paid leave to vote on Tuesday, in conjunction with non-partisan efforts at ElectionDay.org and MakeTimetoVote.org. As of Monday, it was the sole law firm listed by either initiative as taking part.
Read More:
Behind Clinton and Trump, an Army of Lawyers on High Alert
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250