Working Pro Bono for Trump, Rudy Giuliani in Divorce Proceedings Says He Can't Afford Wife's Expenses
Rudolph Giuliani, the public face of President Donald Trump's legal team, appeared in a Manhattan courtroom on Wednesday to deal with his own legal issues: a divorce from his third wife, who claims that the well-heeled former New York City mayor has cut her off financially.
November 07, 2018 at 02:29 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Rudolph Giuliani, the public face of President Donald Trump's legal team, appeared in a Manhattan courtroom on Wednesday to deal with his own legal issues: a divorce from his third wife, who claims that the well-heeled former New York City mayor has cut her off financially.
Since Giuliani, who served as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York from 1983 to 1989, split with Greenberg Traurig this past spring, he has been working pro bono for Trump and has taken on the task of mounting legal defenses for Trump, often in front of television cameras.
In recent months, Giuliani, 74, has worked on behalf of a lobbying firm seeking to influence the Romanian government on how it approaches ethics enforcement and, according to a report from ProPublica and WNYC, been making frequent trips to Russia, Armenia and Ukraine.
All told, Giuliani made $9.5 million last year, said Bernard Clair of Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Lans & Rottenstreich, who represents Giuliani's estranged wife, in a hearing before Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Michael Katz.
The hearing, in which Clair laid out information from the couple's financial records, provided a glimpse into the former mayor's lavish lifestyle—one that includes $12,012 spent on cigars from April to August, as well as more than $7,000 on ink pens.
In that period, Giuliani spent almost $900,000, of which a small portion was charged to a Greenberg Traurig credit card. Giuliani made between $4 million and $6 million while at the firm, Clair said.
But Clair said that, since Giuliani started working full-time for Trump, Giuliani appears to have developed “sudden income deficit syndrome” in the case of his wife, but that he has spent six figures to support his alleged mistress and her family, including paying for their travel expenses.
“My client doesn't care about romantic interest or otherwise, she really doesn't,” Clair said. “What she cares about is that these expenses, for these people, are continuing while she's not received any direct support since August,” Clair said.
Judith Giuliani, who married Rudolph Giuliani in 2003, seeks $63,000 in monthly support as well as costs associated with the couple's six properties, which includes a Park Avenue apartment and two condominiums in Palm Beach, Florida, and costs for country club memberships.
Faith Miller of Miller Zeiderman & Wiederkehr, who represents Rudolph Giuliani in the matter, said that Giuliani has spent $150,000 each month on the couple's living expenses, calling Clair's characterization of her client “insulting.”
“If he chooses to work without compensation for the president, I submit that he should be entitled to do so,” Miller said.
Rudolph Giuliani moved in the case to impose a gag order on his estranged wife; Miller said that allowing his wife to discuss the couple's divorce publicly could “impact his ability to make a living.”
Katz said that the potential effects of Judith Giuliani discussing the case on her husband's income is not an appropriate legal standard for imposing a gag order, but told the parties that he is “not particularly interested in having the case litigated in the press.”
Judith Giuliani filed for divorce in April, just days after he took a tour of a New Hampshire hospital run by his alleged mistress, Maria Ryan, which a local ABC affiliate filmed for a news segment.
After the visit, Rudolph Giuliani and Ryan reportedly took a trip together to a resort hotel.
Despite their feuding over finances, the Giulianis appeared cordial in the courtroom: when she entered, Judith Giuliani approached Rudolph Giuliani, who was wearing a black suit with pinstripes, shook his hand and said, “Nice to see you.”
Read more:
My Mentor Rudy Giuliani Is Unrecognizable to Me
Giuliani, in Flurry of Comments, Offers Clues to Trump Team's Evolving Claims
Giuliani Resigns From Greenberg Traurig for 'All-Consuming' Trump Role
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 2K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 3'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 4Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 5After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250