Plaintiffs Firm Hits Chemical Distributor Univar With 5 Lawsuits Alleging Race Discrimination, Wage Violations
The lawsuits claim the alleged hostile actions were part of a corporate culture in which black employees were consistently overlooked for advancement opportunities, and retaliated against when they complained.
November 09, 2018 at 05:07 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A national chemical distribution company has been hit with five federal lawsuits since last year by current and former employees, alleging wage-and-hour theft and racial discrimination against its black workers.
The latest lawsuit against Univar USA, filed this week in a federal court in Houston, claims that two drivers, Elton Wilson and Michael Roberts, were regularly passed up for promotions, compared to their white and Hispanic co-workers, and were treated aggressively by white supervisors throughout their tenure.
The Houston lawsuit follows four filed against the company by Valli Kane & Vagnini since last September.
➤➤ Get more labor and employment news with Labor of Law from Law.com. Sign up here.
The complaints allege supervisors and co-workers used racial slurs to refer to former and current employees. They say staff displayed threatening behavior in the office, including hanging a stuffed monkey from a noose over a black worker's desk, and writing offensive graffiti on bathroom walls.
The lawsuits claim these actions were part of a corporate culture in which black employees were consistently overlooked for advancement opportunities, and retaliated against when they complained. A class action suit in Georgia claims the company did not pay a group of 10 former and current workers for overtime pay they should have received.
Jeff Carr, senior vice president and general counsel and secretary for Univar, called the cases meritless. A team from Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, led by shareholder Eva Turner, represents the company.
“Most of the allegations are vague and amorphous, and although they may be enough to satisfy the liberal pleading requirements, they do not form the basis for a successful lawsuit,” Carr said in a statement. “Univar has and will vigorously defend itself against these cases.”
Similar claims—about the use of nooses, racial slurs by supervisors and fellow workers, and other hostile behavior—have been the subject of federal lawsuits in the last year by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and other private attorneys on behalf of black workers. However, while gender discrimination charges filed by the EEOC soared this year, racial charges sunk, according to the latest data from the agency.
“It seems the issues of racial discrimination are not isolated, but rather it is apparent there is a pattern all the way up the chain,” Vagnini said of the lawsuits against Univar. He said he has many cases pending around the country for similar hostile work environments against black workers, where he said employers feel disinterested in solving racial discrimination issues.
The first lawsuit, filed in Dallas federal court, on behalf of workers Kethenus Gill and Raymond Forman, received some attention from local news stations. This prompted other workers in Univar operations around the country to reach out to the plaintiffs firm, Valli Kane & Vagnini partner James Vagnini said in an interview Friday.
Vagnini said he received calls from Georgia about a similar racial discrimination case and another that alleged an overtime violation for a group of workers, and then the Houston workers followed.
“These cases show that Univar's response toward these issues lacked any serious approach to resolve the problems,” said Vagnini, who has not ruled out a class action against Univar for the discrimination claims.
Kim Dickens, Univar's senior vice president and chief human resources officer, said that the company is “built on a foundation of respect,” reinforced every day at the company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigator of the Week: A Long-Sought Win on Preemption for Monsanto at the Third Circuit
Litigators of the Week: A Defense Verdict for Dow and PPG in Quarter Century-Old Environmental Litigation
Litigators of the Week: Sullivan & Cromwell Scores International Arbitration Win for Bayer Over Assets Sold to BASF
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250