Construction Companies Agree to Pay $24M for Worker's Brain Injury
According to court papers, plaintiff Leon Oates, a construction worker, broke through a drop ceiling tile during the construction project and fell about 15 feet, before falling another roughly 15 feet down a concrete staircase, leaving him in a "semi-conscious, infant-like state, entirely unable to walk, communicate, or care for himself."
November 13, 2018 at 04:33 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Three companies have agreed to pay a total of $24.1 million to settle claims brought by the family of a man who was rendered “infant-like” after a debilitating brain injury he suffered during the construction of the Conshohocken Rowing Center.
According to court papers, plaintiff Leon Oates, a construction worker who focused on caulking, broke through a drop ceiling tile during the construction project and fell about 15 feet, before falling another roughly 15 feet down a concrete staircase. The fall left Oates, 41 at the time, in a “semi-conscious, infant-like state, entirely unable to walk, communicate, or care for himself,” court papers filed by his wife and daughter said.
The plaintiffs had brought claims against the general contractor for the project and two subcontractors. On Nov. 7, counsel for the plaintiffs notified the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas that the case had resolved.
According to plaintiffs' counsel, the general contractor C. Raymond Davis & Sons Inc. agreed to tender its $16 million insurance policy, subcontractor Budget Maintenance tendered its $6 million policy, and Accelerated Fire Protection, another subcontractor involved in the project, agreed to provide $2.1 million to the settlement.
“Everybody in this case agreed that Mr. Oates should have been fall-protected,” said Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesky attorney Andrew Duffy, who handled the case with Philadelphia attorney L. Leonard Lundy. “The deposition record was replete with devastating admissions by the general contractor and Budget.”
According to court papers, the construction project was nearing the final stages in August 2014, when it was discovered that a portion of the firewall in the ceiling needed to be caulked. Court papers contended that Accelerated Fire Protection had contracted to provide services including doing any fire barrier caulking. However, court papers said, Accelerated Fire Protection denied that it was responsible to perform the caulking, and so C. Raymond Davis, the general contractor, asked subcontractor Budget Maintenance to do the work.
Oates was the sole employee of a company owned by his wife, Kenyatta Oates. He ended up providing the work for Budget on the fire barrier caulking.
The barrier that needed to be caulked was above the drop ceiling tile, court papers said. In order to access the area, Leon Oates crawled into the truss webs, but one of the beams broke, which caused him to fall.
The plaintiffs contended that, since Oates had to access an area higher than six feet off the ground, he should have been given fall protection. Duffy said that scaffolding had been provided for every other worker who accessed the ceiling. However, according to Oates' pretrial memo, neither C. Raymond Davis nor Budget Maintenance made any safety accommodations.
Oates was medevacked from the scene to a hospital, and was in a coma when he was admitted. He suffered brain hemorrhages and cranial fractures, and was placed on an “external ventricular drain” to control intracranial pressure. He also underwent a tracheostomy and treatments for additional fractures. Oates remained in the hospital for a month before he was discharged.
According to Oates' pretrial memo, he is still at risk for a host of diseases, is incontinent, unable to speak and requires constant care. His condition, court papers said, is permanent.
C. Raymond Davis contended in its pretrial memo that it was immune from suit as Oates' statutory employer. Budget Maintenance contended that Oates assumed the risk when he went into the ceiling without proper fall protections, and Accelerated Fire Protection argued that it owed no duty to Oates.
According to plaintiffs' counsel, there was a total of $25 million in available insurance coverage, so there was no mediation. The plaintiffs demanded the full policies within days of the common pleas court denying summary judgment motions from C. Raymond Davis and Budget. Accelerated Fire Protection agreed to settle before the court ruled on its summary judgment motion.
Lundy said that testimony from Oates' family was one of the main factors that led the parties to settle.
“They're a particularly close family. They are so genuine and sincere. Kenyatta and [daughter] Kenae provide almost 24-hour, round-the-clock care for Leon, with very little outside help,” he said. “They're so devoted to him that the deposition of the two of them just convinced the defendants that this was a devastating injury and the family was just crushed.”
Catherine Walto of Rawle & Henderson, who represented C. Raymond Davis; William Catto of Litchfield Cavo, who represented Budget Maintenance; and Cozen O'Connor attorney Matthew Glazer, who represented Accelerated Fire Protection, each did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Case Study in How Susman Gets Associates Experience in BIG Trials
What a Boost in Infrastructure and Manufacturing Spending in the U.S. Means for Construction Litigators
What Are Giga Projects and What Sorts of Litigation Do They Breed?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250