From IP Disputes to Elder Abuse Allegations, Stan Lee's Legal Universe
Lawyer superheroes. A Supreme Court reference. Alleged elder abuse. Marvel comics founder Stan Lee, who died this week, had many encounters with the U.S. court system during his life.
November 13, 2018 at 03:18 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
After analyzing a patent royalty dispute over a Spider-Man toy, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan concluded her majority opinion in 2015's Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment with an unusual citation. Rather than reference a prior case or statute, Kagan paid homage to the 1962 work in which Marvel Comics founder Stan Lee, along with collaborator Steve Ditko, first introduced the teen-turned-genetically altered superhero to the public.
“In this world, with great power there must also come—great responsibility,” Kagan wrote, citing a Spider-Man quote that has been making the rounds in social media circles this week, after news broke on Monday that Lee had died at age 95.
A Supreme Court justice pulling words from his iconic character was just one of many times Lee intersected with the American court system. In his fictional world, one of his superhero creations—vigilante crime-fighter Daredevil—spends his days as a lawyer named Matt Murdock. But Lee also kept several lawyers busy in real life, particularly in recent times as accusations of elder abuse targeted former business managers and others close to him.
By the time Kimble came around, Lee was mostly a figurehead at Marvel Entertainment—a company that has helped move Lee's work from the domain of comic books to large-scale Hollywood action films. He made frequent cameo appearances in movies based on Marvel comics, and held a chairman emeritus position at Marvel Entertainment until his death. But others had been running the company's day-to-day operations for years.
Still, as Kagan's opinion implies, Lee's creative legacy remains strongly tied to everything that Marvel does. In the Supreme Court patent case, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr appellate expert Seth Waxman argued for Marvel Entertainment. Waxman said Tuesday that, despite his serving as counsel for Marvel, he didn't have a chance to interact with Lee during that case.
Beyond the Marvel ties, Lee had a direct role in a series of litigation battles that have played out this year, all of which involved lawyers outside of Big Law and came after The Hollywood Reporter published an investigative piece about Lee that included allegations of elder abuse.
The article, released in April, delved into contentious disputes playing out over Lee's care and estate after his wife of nearly 70 years, Joan Lee, died in 2017, also at age 95. The report focused, in part, on Lee's daughter, J.C. Lee, and two of Lee's former business managers—Keya Morgan and Jerardo Olivarez.
Soon afterward, Lee launched a flurry of legal actions. In April, represented by Jonathan Freund and Craig Huber of the small Beverly Hills firm Freund & Brackey, Lee sued Olivarez. That suit alleges fraud and financial abuse and remains pending. It accused Olivarez of being one of several “unscrupulous businessmen, sycophants and opportunists” trying to take advantage of Lee after his wife's death.
Then in May, represented by Adam Grant and Jennifer Levin Stearns of Encino, California's Alpert Barr & Grant, Lee lodged a short-lived, $1 billion lawsuit against POW! Entertainment Inc., a production company he had formed in 2001 with two business partners.
In that suit, Lee alleged that POW! fraudulently signed away rights to use his name and likeness. But the claims were resolved not long after the suit was filed in California state court; in July, several news outlets reported that Lee had dismissed the suit. Grant, who represented Lee in the brief litigation, did not respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
Lee also sought a restraining order in June against Morgan, the other former business manager at the center of The Hollywood Reporter investigation. In that matter, the Marvel creator initially had representation from Tom Lallas—a onetime Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher associate who has spent roughly four decades at the 12-lawyer Levy, Smalls & Lallas in Los Angeles. Lallas did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
But by July, Lallas had been replaced on that matter by Freund, who managed in August to reinstate the restraining order against Morgan after it briefly lapsed amidst confusion over who Lee's lawyer was. Freund was unavailable on Tuesday to discuss his work for Lee.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250