Yahoo Breach Settlement Could Be the First Test of New Class Action Guidelines
Lawyers have responded to U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh's questions in what could be the first test case for new class action settlement guidance in California's Northern District.
November 14, 2018 at 05:23 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
In what appears to be the first test case for the Northern District of California's new class settlement guidance, lawyers submitted new details about the $85M Yahoo data breach settlement in response to probing questions from a federal judge.
Following lawyers' court papers to approve last month's settlement, one of the largest for a data breach, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh issued two orders for supplemental information that largely mimic the Northern District of California's new guidance for class action settlements, widely considered the strictest in the nation.
In a Nov. 9 response, some of which was sealed, lawyers filled up 21 pages answering Koh's nine questions, which included more information on the potential class recoveries had the case not settled and the lodestar, or the amount of hours billed by plaintiffs lawyers multiplied by their average hourly rates. Among other things, the guidance said lawyers should provide billing calculations in their fee request and estimate the recoveries had plaintiffs succeeded on their claims.
In their response, lawyers attached an exhibit detailing a lodestar of $22 million for 32 law firms, including Morgan & Morgan, New York's Milberg Tadler Phillips Grossman and Casey Gerry Schenk Francavilla Blatt & Penfield in San Diego. Yet information regarding how much the class could have gotten if the case had not settled was largely sealed.
“Disclosure of this information would reveal class counsels' work product and mental impressions of the case,” wrote plaintiffs' lawyer John Yanchunis in a declaration. “Protection of attorneys work product in the form of mental impressions is sacrosanct.”
Neither Yanchunis, of Morgan & Morgan in Tampa, Florida, nor defense attorney Ann Marie Mortimer of Hunton Andrews Kurth in Los Angeles, responded to requests for comment. The defendants are Altaba Inc., the division of Verizon formerly known as Yahoo, and Oath Holdings Inc., which owns Yahoo's holding company.
Koh plans to hear oral arguments on preliminary approval of the settlement at a Nov. 29 hearing.
In 2016, Yahoo announced that 500 million accounts had been hacked in 2014, compromising names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and passwords. Months later, Yahoo disclosed another breach in 2013 that affected 1 billion accounts, a figure that Verizon increased to 3 billion last year. The settlement also involves a third breach in 2015 and 2016.
The deal is one of the largest data breach settlements in U.S. history. It resolves cases in multidistrict litigation before Koh, as well as those brought in California state court, later coordinated in Orange County Superior Court, and class actions brought in Israel.
The settlement includes a $50 million fund from which consumers can make claims for cash reimbursements of out-of-pocket costs, such as fraud charges and professional fees, associated with the breaches. In addition, Yahoo has agreed to provide at least two years of credit monitoring and identity theft protection insurance to class members, and implement enhancements to its security programs.
Lawyers filed a motion for preliminary approval on Oct. 22. Then, on Nov. 1, the Northern District of California published its new guidance on class action settlements.
On Nov. 2, Koh ordered the lawyers in the Yahoo settlement to provide more information. She also asked why the deal involved 200 million individuals with about 1 billion Yahoo accounts, when three breaches compromised more than 3 billion accounts. She also asked about how they selected the settlement administrator and the number of class members expected to submit claims—both aspects in the guidelines. In a Nov. 5 order, Koh asked more questions about the calculation of the plaintiffs' fee request and the use and retention of class member data provided in the settlement.
In their response, lawyers said they reached the 200 million figure by estimating that 80 percent of the U.S. population of adults living in the United States had Yahoo accounts during the class period. They noted that the number of accounts dropped after Koh dismissed claims by account users in foreign countries, except Israel. Not to mention, they wrote, many individuals had more than one account.
They estimated that between 1 percent and 3 percent of class members would submit claims, based on other breach cases. They also said that Yahoo is paying for and selected the settlement administrator, whose costs could be more than $5 million.
As to the class member data, lawyers said it would be “stored in a climate-controlled data center, with security cameras and restricted key access,” and transferred through a “secure web portal” and “encrypted file share.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 2UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 3Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 46th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 5On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250