ITC Greenlights Investigation of Juul Labs' E-Cigarette Rivals
The trade commission has asked an ALJ to take evidence on the public interest as part of the patent infringement investigation.
December 10, 2018 at 07:57 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The International Trade Commission has launched an investigation in the first of two Juul Labs, Inc.'s suits seeking to exclude dozens of global competitors from marketing e-cigarettes in the United States.
Backed by Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, Juul charges 21 companies with infringing its cartridge-based system for delivering nicotine vapor. Now, In the Matter of Certain Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Components Thereof, the ITC has ordered investigation into whether five different patents were infringed.
According to Juul's Oct. 26 amended complaint, James Monsees and Adam Bowen came up with a simpler and more convenient electronic nicotine delivery systems [ENDS] while graduate students in Stanford University's Product Design program. Those inventions have helped propel Juul Labs and its pod-based system to some 70 percent of the fast-growing e-cigarette market.
Less than two years old, Juul has been valued as high as $15 billion. Critics say it's contributed to rampant underage vaping, but the company insists its product is a healthful alternative for adults who want to quit cigarette smoking.
Juul alleges in its complaint that its success has attracted “copyists” whose liquid nicotine and pod-filling operations are based in China. They “hope to profit by stealing [Juul's] intellectual property,” specifically targeting the manufacturers and distributors behind the Bo One, Eonsmoke, Ziip, Xfire Flair Xtreme, Myle and Pulse devices.
However, three respondents have argued that it would not be in the public interest to exclude their products.
“Juul is the undisputed market leader in attracting youth to electronic cigarettes,” Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg partner Evan Langdon wrote to the commission last month on behalf of Myle Vape Inc. and Shenzhen Joecig Technology Co. Ltd. He notes that though Juul might have cleaned up its social media campaign under pressure from the Food and Drug Administration, it's still targeting teenage audiences in radio ads.
“Myle, on the other hand, has not marketed to underage users” and uses online age verification techniques to exclude them, he adds.
Proposed respondent Eonsmoke, which is represented by Husch Blackwell, adds that the ITC should simply defer to the Food and Drug Administration, which is cracking down on e-cigarette makers and has promised to seize unlawfully marketed products.
Sterne Kessler partner Daniel Yonan replied in a filing that Juul “does not market to minors and uses strict age-gating on its e-commerce website. Yet many in the industry—including the respondents—sell ENDS products with child-friendly flavors and without meaningful age restrictions on their sales.”
In addition to the infringement issues, the ITC instructed Administrative Law Judge David Shaw to take evidence and hear arguments on the public interest and provide the commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on the issue.
Sterne Kessler's team also also includes partners Michael Joffre, Paul Ainsworth, Uma Everett, Nirav Desai and Jonathan Tuminaro. The firm filed an additional complaint against many of the same respondents, and others, over a newer set of patents in November. The ITC hasn't announced yet whether it will launch an investigation into those allegations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 2NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 3Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 4DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
- 5Environmental Law in Trump’s Second Term
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250