Tesla Tapped a Trial Lawyer as GC—What Might That Mean?
Hiring a trial attorney as GC is an uncommon choice, and one that could signal the company expects regulatory or litigation troubles in its future.
December 10, 2018 at 03:44 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Last week, troubled auto company Tesla announced that a trial lawyer Dane Butswinkas will become its general counsel. It's a move that's uncommon, but not entirely unheard of.
John Gilmore, co-founder and managing partner at consulting firm BarkerGilmore, said about one in seven of the GCs his firm's placed have been litigators. More often, companies seek corporate lawyers, he said.
“But if there's a company that is dealing with some sort of regulatory issues or some sort of large class actions, the board definitely actively seeks someone with that litigation background who they know will manage the matter through the end,” Gilmore said.
He said many companies in highly regulated industries, like finance and transportation, look for litigators to lead the legal team. Uber Technologies Inc., for instance, brought on former Associate Attorney General of the United States Tony West as general counsel in 2017 after a year of litigation around trade secrets, data breaches and more.
Tesla's trial lawyer pick comes after a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a series of suits against CEO Elon Musk over his tweets claiming funding was secured to take the company private at $420 a share.
In a statement last week, Butswinkas said he “never imagined joining a company in-house. But Tesla presents a unique and inspiring opportunity.”
Gilmore said litigators may have less business experience than corporate lawyers, but they're often able to catch up fast and tap into outside networks.
“Companies, they're hiring these litigators, and they're able to quickly understand the securities and governance work and … they know how to hire the right people to do the work underneath them,” he said. ”I think the bottom line is everyone should be open to the person and their leadership abilities and there risk tolerance.”
Jamy Sullivan, the executive director of Robert Half Legal, said litigators can also bring a unique set of skills to the GC role. Companies may want a trial lawyer in-house if they predict litigation is coming their way because they bring a new perspective and can help maintain costs, she said.
“If it's a company that's in a litigious perspective they will look for an individual that maybe understands ediscovery really well,” she said.
Sullivan added trial lawyers may have more experience with e-discovery tools, the use of which can help limit costs during heavy litigation periods. Hiring a litigator in-house can also help a company save on outside counsel fees, she said.
In addition, Litigators can further help mitigate risks that lead to litigation in areas such as employment law or cybersecurity.
“When they have a huge risk or a huge litigation that comes up, they still can partner with that outside counsel for more substantive matters,” Sullivan said. “It's more of a balance of being strategic from a corporate perspective, of what can we still keep in house versus always having to outsource everything.”
However, despite their specialized skill sets, Gilmore said lawyers with litigation backgrounds are still less sought after than corporate counterparts. “In comparison to corporate lawyers, there's not as many opportunities,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
- 2Ex-Schnader Partner Nears Settlement in Misappropriated Comp Class Action
- 3The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
- 4Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
- 5Jefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250