Judge Awards Trump Nearly $300K on Stormy Daniels' Dismissed Defamation Claims
Judge S. James Otero reduced the award Trump and his attorneys requested by 25 percent. While finding the attorneys' rates reasonable, the judge noted that the amount of hours the firm spent on matters was "excessive."
December 11, 2018 at 06:30 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A federal judge in Los Angeles has awarded President Donald Trump nearly $300,000 in attorney fees in a defamation lawsuit filed by Stormy Daniels, the porn actress who alleges she had an affair with the president prior to his election.
U.S. District Judge S. James Otero of the Central District of California awarded Trump $292,052.33—a 25 percent reduction of the total $389,403.11 in fees and costs the president and his lawyers at Harder LLP requested after the judge dismissed Daniels' defamation claim in October.
Otero found that the hourly rates charged by Trump's attorneys, which ranged from $841.64 per hour for partner Charles Harder to a little more than $300 per hour for an associate at the firm, were reasonable. However, the judge found that the hours the firm spent on the matters handled were “excessive.”
Daniels sued Trump on April 30 alleging he posted false statements on Twitter when belittling a composite sketch she claimed depicted a man who threatened her to keep quiet about the affair in 2011. The president's tweet said: “A sketch years later about a nonexistent man. A total con job, playing the Fake News Media for Fools (but they know it)!”
Otero in October found that the tweet was the sort of “rhetorical hyperbole” associated with political speech in the United States protected by the First Amendment. In Tuesday's order, the judge called the matter “unique in its nature and scope.”
“It involves a defamation claim against the sitting president of the United States based on a tweet issued by the president from his personal Twitter account,” Otero wrote. “The president has used this Twitter account extensively, both during his campaign and afterwards. The litigation before this court therefore impacts what the president may or may not say in a public forum.”
Daniels' lawyer, Michael Avenatti, took to Twitter to suggest that his client will never have to pay Trump or his former personal attorney Michael Cohen because he expects to win a related matter over a nondisclosure agreement between the parties.
Stormy will never have to pay the felon Cohen or Trump a single dime in attorney's fees, costs or sanctions. The award is dwarfed by the $1.5 million award to be issued in NDA case – the main case where Cohen and Trump have been lying to the court and the public. #Criminals
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) December 11, 2018
In a statement to CNN, Harder called the ruling “a total victory for the president.”
“The court's order, along with the court's prior order dismissing Stormy Daniels' defamation case against the president, together constitute a total victory for the President, and a total defeat for Stormy Daniels in this case,” he said.
Read Judge Otero's fee ruling below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250