Leaks in CBS Sexual Misconduct Probe Put Debevoise, Covington Under Scrutiny
As CBS considers the legal fallout after findings from an internal investigation of sexual misconduct allegations went public last week, two major law firms leading the probe face questions about their efforts to protect confidential witnesses. For Debevoise & Plimpton, this marks the second time this year the firm has been thrust into the spotlight for such a failure.
December 13, 2018 at 04:59 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
For the second time this year, Debevoise & Plimpton has come under scrutiny for the way it handled confidential witnesses amid an internal investigation into sexual misconduct. In the most recent incident, news reports have stated that confidential witnesses may have been compromised when a draft report on sexual misconduct allegations at CBS Corp. leaked to the press.
Debevoise's Mary Jo White was tapped earlier this year, alongside Covington & Burling's Nancy Kestenbaum, to conduct an internal investigation into alleged sexual misconduct on the part of former CEO Leslie Moonves, as first reported by The New Yorker, and former “60 Minutes” executive Jeff Fager. The findings of the investigation may play into a decision that CBS's board is expected to make in January regarding whether Moonves was fired for cause—a determination that would impact whether he receives a potential $120 million severance package.
The internal investigation appears to be ongoing, although multiple news reports indicated that it is in the final results and the findings will likely be presented to the CBS board of directors soon. But the investigation has drawn scrutiny after The New York Times viewed and published details Dec. 4 and Dec. 6 from a draft of the team's investigative report, including descriptions of “transactional” oral sex that Moonves allegedly received from CBS employees. Moonves, represented by Dechert's Andrew Levander, has denied the sexual misconduct accusations.
In light of the revelations in the draft investigatory report, the Wall Street Journal, Vanity Fair and the New York Post have all reported this week that CBS's current top brass is concerned about the company's legal exposure in light of the public airing of the investigation's draft findings. Those concerns include a worry that employees and other witnesses who cooperated with the internal CBS investigation were promised confidentiality and that the leaks may have compromised that expectation of secrecy, according to this week's news reports.
The investigative team acknowledged those concerns in an emailed statement Thursday.
“Covington and Debevoise take this matter very seriously and are working to determine the facts,” said a statement attributed to the independent investigators from both firms.
High-profile internal investigations can be fraught for lawyers who lead them and it is not uncommon to hear criticism that a law firm wasn't sufficiently independent or that it went too easy on the subject of the probe. Those sorts of criticisms were central to a lawsuit filed last month by current and former Dartmouth College students who claim the school and an outside lawyer conducted a faulty investigation into sexual misconduct allegations against three former professors at the Ivy League school.
The CBS investigation leaks, however, have thrust Debevoise and Covington into the spotlight for different reasons. And specifically for Debevoise and White—a former top federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York and head of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for several years during the Obama administration—it is not the first time an investigation has faced scrutiny over its handling of confidential witnesses.
Early in 2018, The American Lawyer reported that White apologized and conceded that an error had been made with respect to witnesses in a sexual misconduct investigation of T. Florian Jaeger, a cognitive science professor at New York's University of Rochester. In that case, when the Debevoise investigators put out their report on Jan. 11, at least some materials made public with the report briefly exposed the names of confidential witnesses before they were amended to make everyone anonymous.
White appears to now be dealing with fallout on a similar issue in the wake of the CBS leak, although it is not clear at this point that any confidential witnesses were, in fact, exposed. Still, the Wall Street Journal's report noted that White had apologized to the CBS board in a meeting after the leak.
Read More:
CBS Taps Firms, Former Prosecutors to Lead Probe Into Moonves Harassment Allegations
Debevoise's Mary Jo White Concedes 'Error' After Rochester Report
From Bridgegate to Bill O'Reilly, Probes Put Law Firms in the Hot Seat
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250