After Threatening Prison, Judge Sullivan Delays Flynn Sentencing
The surprise development came after Sullivan offered to give Flynn more time to consider his decision to plead guilty to lying to investigators probing Russia's interference in the 2016 election.
December 18, 2018 at 01:27 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A federal judge agreed Tuesday to postpone Michael Flynn's sentencing after a hearing to decide the punishment for President Donald Trump's former national security adviser went awry.
The surprise development came after Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington, D.C., offered to give Flynn, a retired lieutenant general, more time to consider his decision to plead guilty to lying to investigators probing Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Sullivan described the offense as “serious” and said he could not guarantee a sentence without prison time, even after the special counsel's office recommended that Flynn not be incarcerated.
After a brief recess, Covington & Burling partner Robert Kelner said Flynn was “prepared to take your honor up on the suggestion of delaying sentencing.” The delay, Kelner said, would allow Flynn to “eke out the last modicum of cooperation” in his deal to assist in a separate case being prosecuted in Alexandria, Virginia, involving two of Flynn's former business associates.
Kelner envisioned that Flynn could be called to testify in a case against Bijan Rafiekian and Kamil Ekim Alptekin, who were charged Monday with acting as unregistered agents of the Turkish government and lying to the FBI.
Sullivan set a March 13 deadline for a status report.
The surprise development came after what began as a routine sentencing hearing devolved into a dramatic discussion on Flynn's conduct. Sullivan at one point questioned whether, “hypothetically,” Flynn could have been charged with treason and told the former lieutenant general that, “arguably, you sold out your country.”
Sullivan later walked back those comments.
Still, Sullivan spoke at length Tuesday about the seriousness of Flynn's crime, at one point expressing “disdain” for his actions. He cautioned Flynn that, if they proceeded to sentencing on Tuesday, he could not rule out prison.
“I'm going to be frank with you: This crime is very serious,” Sullivan said, highlighting more than once how Flynn was a high-ranking official who lied to the FBI on White House grounds.
Sullivan described how Flynn worked as an unregistered agent of a foreign power while serving as a Trump adviser, later correcting his statement. But in that exchange, the judge pointed to a flag behind him and said Flynn's conduct arguably undermined “everything this flag” stands for.
At the start of Tuesday's hearing, the judge pressed defense attorneys about a court memo that appeared to suggest federal investigators led Flynn to lie during his January 2017 FBI interview. The filing noted Flynn was not warned that lying to the FBI was illegal, and that he did not have counsel present during the interview.
Sullivan said the filing “raised some concerns” with the court, and questioned how it was consistent with Flynn's acceptance of responsibility.
Kelner explained the filing was meant to distinguish Flynn's case from those of former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos and former Skadden associate Alex van der Zwaan, who were sentenced to prison terms of 14 days and 30 days, respectively. The “aggravating circumstances” in the Papadopoulous and van der Zwaan cases don't apply to Flynn, Kelner said, adding the former national security adviser “fully accepts responsibility” and “stands by his guilty plea.”
Kelner later emphasized that Flynn's attorneys, not Flynn, had written that filing.
The judge also squarely asked Flynn in the morning if he wished to challenge the circumstances in which the FBI interviewed him.
“No, your honor,” Flynn replied.
Asked if he was continuing to accept responsibility for his false statements, Flynn said: “I am, your honor,” before he re-entered his guilty plea before the court.
Flynn pleaded guilty last December to lying to federal investigators, and misleading investigators about his contact with ex-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition. He also admitted to filing false paperwork with DOJ related to his lobbying work for Turkey.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250