Daily Dicta: Boies Schiller Settles Au Pair Class Action for $65M
The settlement doesn't explicitly require au pairs to be paid at least $7.25 an hour. It just stipulates that the defendants must make it clear “that host families and au pairs are free to agree to compensation higher than the legally applicable minimum.”
January 10, 2019 at 01:40 PM
4 minute read
Over the years, I've known multiple families with au pairs. Some of them were good, some were flaky, but they were all amazingly cheap: 45 hours a week of childcare for $195.75, regardless of how many children you have, plus light housework.
That era is now ending.
On Wednesday, Boies Schiller Flexner and co-counsel Towards Justice settled a class action on behalf of nearly 100,000 underpaid au pairs for $65.5 million.
In 2014, firm partners Peter Skinner and Matthew Schwartz teamed up with the Colorado-based non-profit and sued the 15 agencies designated by the U.S. State Department as the exclusive “sponsors” of J-1 visas for au pairs, alleging that they conspired to illegally fix standard au pair wages.
The agencies allegedly set au pair pay at $4.35 an hour—well below the federal minimum wage of $7.25. However, the host families are required to provide room and board for their au pairs. Once that's factored in, the defendants say the au pairs receive compensation that's equivalent to the minimum wage. Moreover, they point to a longstanding State Department formula that sets this minimum “stipend.”
In February of 2018, U.S. District Judge Christine Arguello in Colorado certified two classes and multiple subclasses of more than 91,000 J-1 visa au pairs. The case was slated for trial next month.
The settlement doesn't explicitly require au pairs to be paid at least $7.25 an hour. It just stipulates that the defendants must make it clear “that host families and au pairs are free to agree to compensation higher than the legally applicable minimum.”
However, the judge in an earlier holding wrote that “The court believes that the [Fair Labor Standards Act] does, in fact, apply to plaintiffs' claims here”—suggesting that paying the actual minimum wage might be prudent.
Still, that's only $326.25 a week. By comparison, a live-in nanny commands an average of $652 a week, while a live-out nanny makes an average of $705 a week, according to the plaintiffs.
The settlement terms call for the plaintiffs lawyers to get 35 percent of the total, or about $23 million. Which I'm pretty sure is way more than $7.25 an hour.
What I'm Reading
How Atlanta Solo Practitioner Was Tapped by Justice Thomas for Coveted Amicus Argument
It was a rare opportunity—the court picks amicus counsel only a handful of times every year, and those slots have often gone to former Supreme Court clerks.
The pro se suit was brought by Thierno Diallo, a Guinean immigrant who worked in the company's Midtown East store from September 2012 until December 2015.
“Unilaterally obtained ethics guidance is not a shield that allows counsel to continue a representation where that representation creates an untenable conflict.”
At the top of 2019, which Florida cases have lawyers checking dockets with bated breath?
He accidentally bought tickets for Jan. 17 instead of March 14 or 15. And the reason this is Ticketmaster's fault is because…?
Please don't leave.
In case you missed it…
In a new court filing in the Mueller probe on behalf of Russia-based Concord Management, Reed Smith partner Eric Dubelier got peevish.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250