Judge Rules Plaintiff in Ogletree Gender Discrimination Suit Bound by Arbitration Agreement
A federal judge in San Francisco found that former nonequity shareholder Dawn Knepper, who is pursuing gender discrimination claims against the firm, failed to opt out of the firm's arbitration agreement.
January 10, 2019 at 04:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A federal judge in San Francisco has found that a former nonequity shareholder of national labor and employment firm Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart is bound by the firm's arbitration agreement after she failed to opt out of it.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick III of the Northern District of California on Wednesday found that Dawn Knepper, who filed a proposed $300 million gender discrimination class action against the firm almost a year ago, was subject to the firm's arbitration agreement after she continued to work at Ogletree past the deadline to sign and return a form opting out of it.
Knepper's lawyers at Sanford Heisler Sharp had maintained that she hadn't read emails pointing employees to the firm's arbitration agreement and the opt-out form. Knepper, who is now a shareholder at Buchalter in Orange County, submitted a declaration stating that if she had known she needed to opt out of the agreement to avoid arbitration she would have done so.
“That Knepper—an experienced employment law attorney—may not have read or fully comprehended the contents of those emails and their attachments does not preclude a determination that she is bound by the Arbitration Agreement,” wrote Orrick in a 15-page opinion.
“While Knepper's experience as an employment law attorney may not be dispositive, it is significant and weighs in favor of concluding that she is facially covered by the Arbitration Agreement,” the judge continued. “Knepper's attempt to analogize Ogletree's actions to situations where defendants attempt to impose arbitration on unsophisticated workers or on consumers is not well-taken.”
Orrick's decision transfers the case to the Central District of California since Knepper worked in Ogletree's Orange County office and the majority of defense witnesses in the case are based there. Ogletree's lawyers at Paul Hastings have indicated that they intend to ask to compel arbitration once the case is transferred to the Central District.
Nancy Abell at Paul Hastings, who has been representing the firm in the case, passed along a request for comment to a firm representative who said in an email that the firm was “pleased with the ruling.”
“Equal opportunity has been a core principle of Ogletree Deakins since the firm's founding, and we do not tolerate discrimination of any kind—gender or otherwise,” the firm representative said. “We will confidently defend the firm against these allegations as we remain steadfast in our commitment to equal opportunity for all.”
Sanford Heisler's David Sanford had asked Orrick for leave to amend the complaint in Knepper's case to add four additional plaintiffs, including former equity shareholder Tracy Warren, who also worked out of Ogletree's Orange County office.
“We remain convinced that Ogletree botched its own arbitration agreement and engaged in systemic gender discrimination against its female partners,” said Sanford, via email. “There are many current and former Ogletree partners (male and female) who will testify on our behalf.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
‘How to Succeed as a Trial Lawyer’: Talking Shop With Author and Veteran Litigator Stewart Edelstein
Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250