Barr Promises Mueller 'Will Be Allowed to Complete His Work'
Barr's written testimony states President Donald Trump sought “no assurances, promises, or commitments” in nominating him for U.S. attorney general.
January 14, 2019 at 01:03 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
William Barr, President Donald Trump's nominee for U.S. attorney general, will seek to persuade senators Tuesday that he'll protect special counsel Robert Mueller III's investigation from political interference, according to his written remarks released by the Justice Department.
“If confirmed, I will not permit partisan politics, personal interests, or any other improper consideration to interfere with this or any other investigation,” Barr will tell senators, according to his prepared testimony. “I will follow the Special Counsel regulations scrupulously and in good faith, and on my watch, Bob will be allowed to complete his work.”
Barr, of counsel at Kirkland & Ellis, will field questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee beginning Tuesday as part of his two-day confirmation hearing. Among the host of questions he will face, one topic is sure to dominate the rest: the fate of the special counsel probe and a final report on its findings.
➤➤ Keep up with Trump's legal team and the latest maneuvers in the Mueller investigation. Sign up for Trump Watch by Ellis Kim.
The nominee, who previously served as U.S. attorney general from 1991 to 1993, is expected to assume oversight of Mueller's investigation. In his remarks, Barr said he believes it is “very important” that the public and lawmakers are informed of the “results” of the special counsel's work.
“For that reason, my goal will be to provide as much transparency as I can consistent with the law. I can assure you that, where judgments are to be made by me, I will make those judgments based solely on the law and will let no personal, political, or other improper interests influence my decision,” Barr will say.
Barr will also seek to downplay a June 2018 memo he sent to the Justice Department. The 19-page letter, deriding a possible inquiry into whether Trump committed obstruction of justice, has fallen under intense scrutiny. In his remarks, Barr describes the memo as “narrow in scope” and only addressing a single obstruction of justice theory he believed Mueller was pursuing.
“The memo did not address—or in any way question—the Special Counsel's core investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Nor did it address other potential obstruction-of-justice theories or argue, as some have erroneously suggested, that a President can never obstruct justice,” Barr said.
Barr, pledging to run an independent Justice Department, also plans to testify that Trump sought “no assurances, promises, or commitments from (Barr) of any kind, either express or implied.” Trump nominated Barr in December after former AG Jeff Sessions resigned at the president's request.
Barr visited several committee members on Capitol Hill last week in preparation for his hearing.
One of them—committee chair Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina—said Barr indicated he would ensure that Mueller could complete his probe. Graham also said Barr described Mueller as a longtime friend, a description matched by Barr's written testimony.
But Graham's comments did not assuage the concerns of some of the panel's Democrats, who are expected to seek firm commitments from Barr during his hearing.
“I want an ironclad, specific commitment that he will support the special counsel,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, said Wednesday. “Not only to avoid interfering and to protect the special counsel from political interference, but that he will support the special counsel when subpoenas are requested and when indictments are sought.”
Blumenthal also said he wants Barr “to commit to full disclosure” of a final Mueller report.
Democrats plan to press Barr on an array of topics, including his views on the Justice Department's controversial decision last summer to drop its defense of the Affordable Care Act.
“I want to know whether he'll defend the United States when it's sued on the Affordable Care Act,” Blumenthal said, referring to ongoing or future litigation involving the law. “He has to tell me, 'I'll defend the laws of the United States.'”
Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, echoed that concern. She said Wednesday she intends to also question Barr on voting and civil rights, and the DOJ's consent decrees with police departments—all matters she said fell “by the wayside” under Sessions.
Barr, in his written remarks, also outlined his priorities for the Justice Department, if confirmed. He said he will prioritize fighting violent crime, prosecuting hate crimes, enforcing and improving immigration laws, and ensuring the integrity of elections.
“I will build on the work already done by Special Counsel Mueller and current Department of Justice leadership and ensure that the full might of our resources are brought to bear against foreign persons who unlawfully interfere in our elections. I believe that our country must respond to any foreign interference with the strongest measures, and we must work with partners at the state level to ensure that our election infrastructure is completely protected,” he said.
Read the prepared remarks here:
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
'Vision': Judge David Tatel on the Value of Oral Argument and Reading Drafts Aloud
Trending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect
- 3Simpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
- 4How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 5Big Firms May See 'Uncomfortable Flashbacks' as Cost Pressure Grows
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250