FedEx to Pay $35 Million to Settle Charges of Shipping Untaxed Cigarettes to New York
"FedEx knowingly engaged in illegal and harmful behavior at the expense of New Yorkers' health” and it "swindled New York City and State out of millions of dollars in tax revenue,” Attorney General Letitia James said.
January 14, 2019 at 05:06 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The New York Attorney General's Office and city Law Department announced a $35.3 million settlement with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. that resolves three lawsuits alleging FedEx teamed up with cigarette trafficking businesses to ship hundreds of thousands of untaxed cigarettes to New Yorkers.
“For years, FedEx knowingly engaged in illegal and harmful behavior at the expense of New Yorkers' health,” Attorney General Letitia James said in the statement. “Not only did FedEx violate laws created to protect the public from the serious health risks associated with cigarettes, but they also swindled New York City and state out of millions of dollars in tax revenue.”
“For the worst of reasons—profit—FedEx shipped millions of untaxed cigarettes to residents throughout the state,” City corporation counsel Zachary Carter said.
FedEx on Monday did not respond to a request for comment.
In their joint statement, the AG's Office and city Law Department said that the settlement recovers “substantially more” than the amount of lost state and city taxes and that those additional amounts represent “in large part, a penalty.”
“FedEx was previously investigated for this same conduct, the conduct was longstanding and pervasive throughout the company, and the conduct had the potential to negatively impact public health,” the offices said in naming some factors, among others, that led to what they called a penalty.
The exact amount of lost taxes was not stated.
The offices—which for years jointly investigated and prosecuted the matter—said that the illegal shipping lasted for some 10 years, and they noted that “the evidence is clear that cigarette taxes are the most effective means of deterring smoking.”
“FedEx's conduct frustrated the public health purpose underlying such taxes—to reduce cigarette smoking,” they said.
The settlement resolves three federal lawsuits, all filed between 2013 and 2017 in the Southern District of New York, according to a separate email from Law Department spokesman Nicholas Paolucci.
Paolucci added that the three suits put forward essentially the same illegal shipping allegations, but addressed cigarette shipments for different FedEx customers. One suit named FedEx Freight as well as FedEx Ground, he said.
In the joint statement, the AG's Office and Law Department also said that settlement comes after an important October 2018 ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York.
Ramos found that “FedEx's conduct over many years for customers with such names as 'Cigarettes Direct To You' established without the need for a trial that FedEx had knowingly violated a federal anti-cigarette trafficking statute and a 2006 Assurance of Compliance with the [AG's] Office in which, to avoid prosecution, FedEx expressly agreed to cease residential cigarette deliveries and comply with a New York law prohibiting those deliveries,” the offices said in their statement.
In addition to the $35.3 million payment, the settlement also requires FedEx to both put in place internal reforms and hire an independent consultant to oversee FedEx's compliance with the law and provide compliance reports.
Specifically, according to the statement, FedEx will “cease domestic shipments of tobacco products, including cigarettes (with limited exceptions set forth in the settlement agreement)”; “implement company-wide communications and annual training concerning tobacco shipments, including mandatory notices by employees to company officials if tobacco shipments are discovered”; “take disciplinary action against any employee or contractor who knowingly facilitates tobacco shipments”; and “retain an independent consultant recommended by the city and state to both advise and monitor the company's compliance with the settlement agreement and with federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the shipment of tobacco [and] the consultant will immediately report violations to the city and state and provide quarterly reports.”
The settlement agreement terms will be extended by one year for each year in which there is a material breach of the agreement as determined by a court or special master, the statement also said.
It added that “as New York has increased the tax rate on cigarettes, the number of smokers in New York has sharply declined. According to the World Health Organization, maintaining high taxes on cigarettes is the most effective anti-smoking policy intervention, particularly among youth.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250