Ken Starr on Why He Doesn't Expect a Starr-Style Report on Trump
Between signing and selling copies of his new book, former independent counsel Ken Starr talked about why he isn't looking for special counsel Robert Mueller to produce a page-turner on the Trump administration.
January 17, 2019 at 06:07 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
The independent counsel who investigated President Bill Clinton told the Atlanta Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society Thursday not to expect a similarly detailed report from Robert Mueller on President Donald Trump.
“We may not have that much to read when the Mueller report finally comes out,” Kenneth Starr said to a packed room full of lawyers and judges over lunch at the Peachtree Street offices of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton.
“Minimalist” was the word Starr used to describe what he expects to see from Mueller's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. “Firecracker” was the term he used referring to his own detailed report that was published on the Internet and across multiple pages of newspapers in 1998.
Starr talked about what has changed since his report. And he sold and signed piles of copies of his new book, “Contempt: A Memoir of the Clinton Investigation.” The cover photo shows Hillary Rodham Clinton whispering in the ear of her husband, President Bill Clinton.
“The name of the book is harsh,” Starr said. “But it was the president's own fault.”
Clinton “could have settled it,” Starr said. He didn't say how, but he suggested by resigning the presidency as Richard Nixon did when impeachment loomed. Instead, Clinton fought impeachment and survived it.
“William Jefferson Clinton had contempt” for the law, Starr said. He said the key point in his 11-count indictment of Clinton wasn't perjury—lying about his affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky—but abuse of power.
Starr had praise for Trump's choice for attorney general, Bill Barr. “He will be a wonderful attorney general,” Starr said. And he gave the Senate Judiciary Committee high marks for what he said was an evenhanded approach to questioning Barr in his confirmation hearing Tuesday.
“This was a magnificent week,” Starr said. “The Senate Judiciary Committee is back from the abyss. I won't name it. I'll just call it the recent unpleasantness.”
He did later name the man at the center of the “recent unpleasantness” before the Senate committee: now-U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Two decades ago, Kavanaugh was among the Starr advisers saying the report was too detailed. “Take some of this out,” he said Kavanaugh and others advised. “This is horrible.”
Starr agreed the report was horrible, but he said it was necessary to prove that the president had committed an impeachable offense. So the details stayed in—right down to the number of buttons to be undone on Monica Lewinsky's dress and what the president did and didn't do after that.
Starr was asked during a lively response from the audience if he were aware of the impact his report had on the next generation's views of sex and social standards.
“There has been a coarsening of the discourse and a sexualization of our culture,” Starr said. “And it was the level of detail we felt we had to go into.”
As he put on his hat to head for the elevators to catch a flight back to Texas, Starr paused in the hallway for one more question: Why does he expect Mueller's report to be so completely different from his own?
The difference is in the structure of the investigation, he said. As independent counsel, Starr reported directly to Congress. And it was the decision of Congress to release the report. And he agrees with his friend and former colleague Barr that the Mueller report should be made public as well. But Mueller's report will go to the attorney general, and the Justice Department is under the executive authority of the president.
Starr is currently of counsel at the Lanier Law Firm in Houston. He is a former president of Baylor University and dean of Pepperdine University School of Law. He also has served as a U.S. solicitor general and a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Starr earned his undergraduate degree from George Washington University, a master's degree from Brown University and his law degree from Duke University Law School. He and his wife of 48 years live in Waco, Texas, and are the parents of three children and the grandparents of seven, according to an introduction given by Atlanta Lawyers Chapter of The Federalist Society chairman Frank Strickland.
Like his report 21 years ago, Starr's memoir is a page-turner. He admits he understands why Monica Lewinsky still blames him for the heartache she experienced after the investigation was made public. But Starr said the blame lies at the feet of the president, for exploiting the young intern and the first lady who stood by him.
“In her fierce but misguided loyalty, Monica allowed herself to become a tragic figure of late twentieth-century America,” Starr writes in the book. “She carries with her forever the living reality of the Clintons' victim-strewn path to power, the most visible casualty of the Clintons' contempt.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
'Vision': Judge David Tatel on the Value of Oral Argument and Reading Drafts Aloud
Trending Stories
- 1Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 2NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 3Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 4DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
- 5Environmental Law in Trump’s Second Term
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250