Ex-CBS Head Moonves to Fight for $120M Severance in Arbitration
CBS said in a filing with the SEC that Moonves had informed the company Wednesday that he intended to use a binding arbitration provision in his contract to try to recover his "golden parachute" after the company determined there were grounds to fire him for cause.
January 17, 2019 at 03:45 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
CBS Corp. announced Thursday that Les Moonves, who resigned as CEO in September amid allegations of sexual harassment, was challenging the company's decision last month to deny him his $120 million severance package.
CBS said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that Moonves had informed the company Wednesday that he intended to use a binding arbitration provision in his contract to try to recover his “golden parachute” after the company determined there were grounds to fire him for cause. The development was first reported Thursday morning by The Wall Street Journal.
CBS said that it did not plan to comment further while the arbitration was pending.
The company announced Dec. 17 that an investigation had concluded Moonves violated company policies, breached his employment agreement and failed to fully cooperate with a probe into allegations that he had forced himself on women and retaliated against those who rebuffed his advances.
New York-based Dechert partner Andrew J. Levander, an attorney for Moonves, last month attacked the decision as “foreordained,” telling media organizations that his client “vehemently denies any non-consensual sexual relations and cooperated extensively and fully with investigators.” Levander did not return a call Thursday seeking comment on the arbitration.
Under the terms of Moonves' contract, the confidential arbitration proceedings will be conducted before the American Arbitration Association in New York, under the laws of the Empire State. CBS and Moonves would each get to select one arbitrator, who in turn would agree on a third to round out the three-member panel.
The arbitrators' decision would be “final and conclusive.” Appeals in arbitration cases are exceedingly rare and typically require a showing of egregious conduct by arbitrators, such as fraud or undisclosed bias on the panel.
Should Moonves prevail on at least one claim, CBS would bear his attorney fees and the costs of arbitration. If Moonves loses, however, the parties would split costs and each pay their own attorney fees, according to the terms of Moonves' contract.
Barry H. Genkin, a partner at Blank Rome in Philadelphia, said the move from Moonves came as no surprise after CBS's decision to deny his severance, and private arbitration presented little downside for the former executive, after months of bruising headlines regarding his personal conduct.
“There's little cost for Moonves,” Genkin said. “From his perspective, I guess he can't end up any worse than he is now.”
The sides could still agree to a settlement. However, CBS has faced pressure over its handling of sexual harassment allegations, and the company has given no indication that it intends to make any payment to Moonves, making arbitration an all-or-nothing venture for the former executive.
“I don't think that this is a situation where there's a likelihood” of a settlement, Genkin said. “I have every reason to believe CBS is going to stick firmly to the position it has taken so far.”
In August, the company tapped Covington & Burling and Debevoise & Plimpton to investigate Moonves' conduct after The New Yorker reported that he had engaged in a pattern of abusive behavior for decades and used his position to threaten women who rejected him. Moonves said that he regretted making women feel uncomfortable, but he has denied allegations of abuse and retaliation.
CBS announced in September that it had reached a settlement with its controlling shareholder, National Amusements Inc., in a Delaware court case to have Moonves leave the company. Moonves and CBS agreed to donate $20 million to organizations that support the #MeToo movement, but the company made Moonves' $120 million severance package dependent on a determination of whether there was reason to fire him with cause.
In December, CBS said the investigation found that Moonves had engaged in “willful and material misfeasance.” Though harassment and retaliation were not pervasive at the company, CBS said it had “begun to take robust steps to improve the working environment for all employees.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250