In Written Opinion, DC Judge Acknowledges 'There Is Real Hardship Being Felt by Innocent Federal Employees'
"I empathize with the plaintiffs' positions. They are not the ones at fault here," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon says in his written ruling in a shutdown suit from federal employees. Leon earlier this week ruled from the bench, denying a temporary restraining order.
January 18, 2019 at 05:28 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon this week refused to allow federal workers to resist Trump administration orders to report to duty unpaid during the partial government shutdown. The order, delivered from the bench, was a setback for hundreds of thousands of workers who are required, or being told, to report to work with no compensation.
Leon on Friday issued a six-page written ruling in which he expressed empathy for the plight of federal employees as the shutdown, now the longest in the nation's modern history, drags on. Leon's ruling came in consolidated cases that involve labor unions and individual federal employees who allege their forced work for no pay violates federal law.
Here's a snippet from Leon's written decision:
“I empathize with the plaintiffs' positions. They are not the ones at fault here. Indeed, the judiciary is dealing with the same realities that the executive branch is facing. I have no doubt whatsoever that there is real hardship being felt by innocent federal employees across the country right now.”
Leon went on: “But I want to make something very clear: The judiciary is not just another source of leverage to be tapped in the ongoing squabble between the political branches. We are an independent, co-equal branch of government, and whether or not we can afford to keep the lights on, our oath is to the Constitution and the faithful application of the law. In the final analysis, the shutdown is a political problem. It does not, and can not, change this court's limited role.”
Leon refused to issue a temporary restraining order, saying such a move would be “profoundly irresponsible under these circumstances.” He wrote: “At best, it would create chaos and confusion—at worst, catastrophe!” Leon said: “I am not going to put people's live at risk with a somewhat knee-jerk, blanket TRO.”
The lawyers in the cases will return to Leon's courtroom in Washington, just down the street from the U.S. Capitol, on Jan. 31. The judge wants to hear argument to a pending request for a preliminary injunction. Whether the government is still shutdown then is anyone's guess.
Leon's written order is posted in full below:
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Should I Sue?': Navigating the New APA Landscape With Latham's Phil Perry and Andrew Prins
Litigator of the Week: Akin's Pratik Shah Helps the Chamber Block the NLRB's 'Joint Employer' Rule
Litigators of the Week: Hogan Lovells Duo Protects a 'Speed Bump' for High-Frequency Traders
Trending Stories
- 1Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 2NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 3Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 4DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
- 5Environmental Law in Trump’s Second Term
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250