Boeing Sued Over Deadly Southern California Wildfire
A new lawsuit blamed Boeing, along with Southern California Edison, for causing the Woolsey Fire, which scorched more than 100,000 acres in Southern California last fall.
February 07, 2019 at 06:50 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A new lawsuit alleges that The Boeing Co. was responsible for the deadly wildfire that ravaged Southern California last fall.
The suit, filed Tuesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, is the first to accuse Boeing of playing a role in the Woolsey Fire, which scorched more than 100,000 acres and killed three people in the Los Angeles area. The suit also names Southern California Edison and its parent corporation, Edison International, which face 18 other lawsuits over the Nov. 8 fire.
Boeing owns the Santa Susana Field Laboratory, former site of Rocketdyne, where the suit says California fire officials believe the Woolsey Fire started. The suit alleges that Boeing and Southern California Edison failed to maintain overhead electrical facilities on the property, and that Boeing did not “have an adequate fire-prevention program, or have adequately trained fire-suppression personnel in place.”
“There were issues with respect to vegetation and vegetation management, issues with the response of the fire unit they have there, and whether they were properly activated,” said Ronald Goldman of Los Angeles-based Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, which filed the suit on behalf of more than 100 residents and business owners. “This is a high fire-prone area, and they've had valuable facilities out there for a long time.”
Also on the suit were Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of Kennedy & Madonna in Hurley, New York, and Brian Strange, of Los Angeles-based Strange & Butler. Kennedy teamed with Baum Hedlund on the first trial over Monsanto Co.'s Roundup, which ended with a $289 million verdict last year, and Strange personally fought off flames from the Woolsey Fire that threatened his own Malibu home.
Boeing denied the allegations.
“Security and fire personnel stationed at Santa Susana immediately responded when the fire was first reported and also promptly notified firefighting agencies,” wrote spokeswoman C.J. Nothum in an email. “Upon arrival, the county and municipal fire jurisdictions established incident command over the firefighting activities. Cal Fire [California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection] is conducting an investigation into the origins of the fire. The California Public Utilities Commission is also conducting an investigation. Boeing is fully cooperating with these investigations.”
Southern California Edison said, “At this time, SCE is not commenting on any lawsuits associated with the Woolsey Fire, as an ongoing investigation is underway by Cal Fire and Ventura County Fire. SCE is fully cooperating in their investigation.”
The suit, which seeks an unspecified amount of punitive damages against Edison and Boeing, comes as a Los Angeles Superior Court judge on Tuesday ordered 18 lawsuits over the Woolsey Fire to be coordinated before a single judge. It also comes as another utility, PG&E Corp., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Jan. 29, citing $30 billion in legal liabilities tied to wildfires that took place at the same time as the Woolsey Fire, but in Northern California. Those fires killed 85 people and charred 150,000 acres.
Read the full complaint here: [falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Related Stories:
PG&E Bankruptcy Sparks Potential Fight With Lawyers for Wildfire Victims
From Fighting Wildfires to Preparing Lawsuits, a Hot Week for Lawyers in California
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
Litigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
Trending Stories
- 1Gibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
- 2DC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
- 3Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, so Why Were US Numbers Flat?
- 4In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
- 5Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250