Google Parent Alphabet Sued for Records Related to Data Breach, Alleged Sexual Misconduct
The lawsuit, made public late Thursday, alleged that there was a "credible basis" to suspect mismanagement at the Mountain View, California-based conglomerate, after a pair of news reports brought the controversies to light last October.
February 08, 2019 at 03:37 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Business Court Insider
An investor in Google's parent company Alphabet Inc. has sued in Delaware Chancery Court for corporate documents related to the company's handling of sexual misconduct allegations against top Google executives and a data breach on the defunct Google+ platform, which reportedly exposed the personal information of nearly 500,000 users.
The lawsuit, made public late Thursday, alleged that there was a “credible basis” to suspect mismanagement at the Mountain View, California-based conglomerate, after a pair of news reports brought the controversies to light last October.
“By demonstrating that Alphabet/Google has a history of ignoring and/or covering up complaints of sexual harassment and discrimination by senior company executives, and that the company and very senior executives made false and misleading statements and/or statements omitting material facts that conceded the company's knowledge of the Google+ security breach, plaintiff has demonstrated a credible basis from which it may be reasonably inferred that mismanagement may have occured,” the complaint said.
In a redacted court filing, Alphabet investor Roger Morrell said he sent a demand letter to company management in November seeking records and board minutes dating back to 2013. Morrell said the documents were needed to assess the board's response to allegations of inappropriate sexual conduct by former executives, as well as when the company learned about the Google+ security breach.
Morrell said that Google initially rejected his demand, but agreed to produce documents if he signed a nondisclosure agreement. According to Morrell, Google turned over 589 pages of mostly redacted material, but little of it covered his request.
Google's press office did not respond to an email Friday seeking comment on the lawsuit.
The New York Times reported Oct. 25 that Andrew E. Rubin, then Google's vice president for mobile and digital content, had resigned from the company with a $90 million severance package and a delayed repayment of a $14 million loan, after allegations surfaced that he had coerced a female Google employee into performing oral sex on him.
According to the article, Rubin and another senior Google executive, Amit Singhal, walked away with hefty severance packages after they were accused of inappropriate sexual behavior. A third executive, accused of propositioning a female engineer who was interviewing for a job, left the company Oct. 30, shortly after article was published, but did not receive a severance package, Morrell said in his complaint.
In the wake of The New York Times' reporting, Google employees and contractors staged a walkout to protest sexual harassment and misconduct, as well as a lack of transparency and noninclusive workplace culture.
The other incident at the center of Morrell's lawsuit, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, involved the Google's allegedly delayed response to a glitch in the software for Google+, the company's social media site, which allowed outside developers to access users' profile data. According to the Oct. 8 report, Google knew as early as March that the glitch had allowed third-party app developers to access the full names, email addresses, birth dates, gender and photos of users but decided not to publicly disclose the problem amid fears that it would spark “immediate regulatory interest” at a time when Facebook had already been under scrutiny for the Cambridge Analytica data breach.
On the same day The Wall Street Journal published its report, the company announced that it was terminating Google+ for consumers but said it had found no evidence of misuse.
Morrell is represented by Brian D. Long, Seth D. Rigrodsky and Gina M. Serra of Rigrodsky & Long in Wilmington and Joshua H. Grabar of Grabar in Philadelphia.
According to an online docket-tracking service, Alphabet is represented by Lori W. Will, Jessica A. Hartwell and Jessica Peuscher-Funk of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati in Wilmington.
The case, captioned Morrell v. Alphabet, has been assigned to Vice Chancellor Kathaleen S. McCormick.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Shortly After Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan’s Retirement, Quinn Emanuel Scores Appellate Win for Vimeo
Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
How Kramer Levin's Patent Trial Team Approaches Teaching Tech to Juries
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Fends Off Antitrust Claims for Thomson Reuters Against AI-Backed Start-Up
Trending Stories
- 1Gibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
- 2DC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
- 3Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, so Why Were US Numbers Flat?
- 4In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
- 5Government Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250