SF Judge Acquits Barclays Trader of Fraud Charges in HP Deal
A federal judge in San Francisco has cut short the criminal trial against Barclays foreign exchange trader Robert Bogucki, finding that no reasonable juror could find him guilty.
March 04, 2019 at 03:54 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A federal judge in San Francisco on Monday cut short a criminal trial against Robert Bogucki, the former head of Barclays Capital Inc.'s foreign exchange trading in New York, by granting his lawyers' motion for an acquittal.
A little more than halfway into a trial scheduled to last two weeks, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of the Northern District of California found that Bogucki and Barclays were operating as principals on the opposite side of a complicated foreign exchange transaction with Hewlett-Packard, rather than as HP's agent.
“Here, the government has pursued a criminal prosecution on the basis of conduct that violated no clear rule or regulation, was not prohibited by the agreements between the parties, and indeed was consistent with the parties' understanding of the arms-length relationship in which they operated,” Breyer wrote Monday in a 13-page order granting Bogucki's acquittal motion. “The court cannot permit this case to go to the jury on such a basis.”
Bogucki is represented by lawyers at Kaplan Hecker & Fink and Clarence Dyer & Cohen.
Kaplan Hecker's Sean Hecker said in a phone interview Monday that “this is a case that never made any sense.”
“This was a transaction based on binding contracts entered into by sophisticated parties,” Hecker said. “I do think this is of a piece with the Justice Department being over-eager to prosecute individuals for practices in markets that were really unregulated. There's a core due process problem with coming in years later and trying to assign criminal liabilty to practices that no one in the market could have reasonably forseen that would have crossed the line.”
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California, which was prosecuting the case alongside the U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division's Fraud Section, said the office had no comment.
Prosecutors brought charges of wire fraud and conspiracy against Bogucki last year claiming that he misused information provided by HP, which had hired Barclays in September 2011 to execute a £6 billion foreign exchange transaction related to its planned acquisition of a UK-based Autonomy. Prosecutors claimed that Bogucki misled HP and its officials to conceal the self-serving nature of the bank's actions in the market.
But at the end of the trial day Feb. 28, Breyer said the government had a “massive due-process problem.” The government had hammered against Barclays' “front-running” when no rules prohibited Barclays from pre-positioning itself and hedging in regards to the Barclays deal, the judge said. Indeed, the judge pointed out in Monday's ruling that International Swaps Dealers Association agreement that governed the underlying deal made clear that the bank and the company were “engaged as principals at opposite sides of an arms-length transaction.”
The judge also found that the government couldn't prove that Bogucki made false or misleading statements that could have influenced HP officials to part with money. Breyer pointed out that the HP official who was the primary point of contact with the Barclays team testified at trial that he “bluffed” or was “BS-ing” Barclays during the parties' interactions. Breyer wrote that “the import of [the HP official's] own dishonesty and expectations regarding Barclays' honesty is not that it shows HP to have been attempting to defraud Barclays—and to be perfectly clear, the Court does not hold the view that HP was attempting to defraud Barclays—but rather that it shows what expectations the parties had for one another, and thus whether even false statements had the capability of influencing HP's decision-making.”
Hecker said Monday that his client “did his job and did it exceptionally well, providing the best pricing on the market to a bank client while protecting his employer, all the while following the rules that governed foreign exchange market makers.”
He said, “It's unfair to have a one-way attack on a party in a sophisticated transaction.”
Read Judge Breyer's order: [falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case
Litigators of the Week: Second Circuit Tells Argentina to Turn Over More Than $300M to Bondholders
How One of the World's Largest Institutional Investors Approaches Litigation
Big Law and Litigation Finance Seem to Be Having a Moment
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250