Sweeping Trump Probe Means Busy Times for These Big Law Partners
The committee, led by U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, sent more than 80 letters and document demands as part of an investigation "into the alleged obstruction of justice, public corruption, and other abuses of power by President Trump, his associates, and members of his administration."
March 04, 2019 at 01:50 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Dozens of lawyers in Big Law and boutiques got hit with demands for documents Monday from the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, which launched a sweeping investigation of the Trump administration and individuals and entities in the orbit of the president, his family, election campaign and business empire.
The committee, led by U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, sent more than 80 letters and document demands as part of an investigation “into the alleged obstruction of justice, public corruption, and other abuses of power by President Trump, his associates, and members of his administration.”
“We must protect and respect the work of Special Counsel Mueller, but we cannot rely on others to do the investigative work for us,” Nadler said in a statement. “Our work is even more urgent after senior Justice Department officials have suggested that they may conceal the work of the Special Counsel's investigation from the public.”
Nadler said the special counsel, Robert Mueller III, and prosecutors in the Southern District of New York “are aware that we are taking these steps.”
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement: “The House Judiciary Committee's letter has been received by the White House. The Counsel's Office and relevant White House officials will review it and respond at the appropriate time.” President Donald Trump on Monday called the House investigation a “political hoax.”
Here's a snapshot of some of the lawyers representing figures in the Trump orbit who received letters from Nadler on Monday:
>> Benjamin Ginsberg of Jones Day represents the Donald Trump campaign. Read the U.S. House demand for documents.
>> William Burck of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan represents former White House counsel Donald McGahn. Read the U.S. House demand for documents. Burck also represents Steve Bannon, former White House chief of staff. Read the House demand.
>> Robert Giuffra of Sullivan & Cromwell represents K.T. McFarland, former deputy national security adviser. Read the U.S. House demand.
>> Michael Bowe of Kasowitz Benson Torres represents Sean Spicer, former White House press secretary. Read the House demand.
>> Alan Futerfas represents Sheri Dillon, the Morgan, Lewis & Bockius partner advising Trump on tax matters. Read the U.S. House demand. Futerfas also represents former deputy White House counsel Stefan Passantino, now at Michael Best. Read the House demand.
>> Abbe Lowell of Winston & Strawn represents Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law. Read the U.S. House demand.
>> Sandeep Savla of Latham & Watkins represents George Nader, a reported business partner with Trump fundraiser Elliott Broidy. Read the House demand.
>> Barry Pollack of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber represents Wikileaks and Julian Assange. Read the U.S. House demand.
>> Robert Trout of Trout Cacheris & Solomon represents Hope Hicks, the former White House communications director. Read the U.S. House demand for documents.
>> William Hurd of Troutman Sanders represents Paul Erickson, former boyfriend of alleged Russian spy Maria Butina. Read the U.S. House demand.
>> Charles Cooper of Cooper & Kirk represents former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Read the U.S. House demand.
>> Charles Stillman and James Mitchell of Ballard Spahr represent Dylan Howard, chief content officer at American Media Inc. Read the House demand.
>> Mary Mulligan of Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman represents Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization's chief financial officer. Read the U.S. House demand.
>> Robert Wolf of Moses & Singer represents Felix Sater, a Trump business associate. Read the U.S. House demand.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case
Litigators of the Week: Second Circuit Tells Argentina to Turn Over More Than $300M to Bondholders
How One of the World's Largest Institutional Investors Approaches Litigation
Big Law and Litigation Finance Seem to Be Having a Moment
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250