Shout-Out: $26M Win for Clare Locke in Defamation Suit
Husband and wife litigators Tom Clare and Libby Locke—founders of Kirkland & Ellis spin-off boutique Clare Locke—led a team in winning a $26 million defamation verdict against Puma Biotechnology and its CEO.
March 19, 2019 at 12:32 PM
2 minute read
Husband and wife litigators Tom Clare and Libby Locke—founders of Kirkland & Ellis spin-off boutique Clare Locke—led a team in winning a $26 million defamation verdict in the Eastern District of North Carolina against Puma Biotechnology and its CEO on Friday.
The pair along with Clare Locke partner Megan Meier sued on behalf of Dr. Fred Eshelman, who founded Pharmaceutical Product Development, a 21,000-employee contract research organization that provides expertise in managing clinical trials.
In 2015, Eshelman invested $22 million in Puma, then started an unsuccessful proxy contest to increase the size of the company's board of directors by four members—including himself.
During the course of the proxy contest, Eshelman said Puma and its CEO, Alan H. Auerbach, falsely accused him of being fired from his position as CEO of Pharmaceutical Product Development after being involved in clinical trial fraud.
Eshelman was deemed to be a public figure—which meant his lawyers had to show actual malice by clear and convincing evidence under the Supreme Court's First Amendment jurisprudence.
But Clare Locke had won public figure trials before, including a $3 million jury verdict in federal court on behalf of UVA dean Nicole Eramo against Rolling Stone in November 2016.
Eshelman's case went to trial in North Carolina on March 11. On March 15, the jurors found that Puma's statements were false and made with actual malice. They awarded $15.85 million in compensatory damages, $6.5 million in punitive damages and $3.8 million in prejudgment interest.
Puma was represented through discovery and summary judgment by Brant Bishop, a founding partner at Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz, and at trial by Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
Litigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: Ingersoll Rand Enforces a Noncompete Against an Exec Who Jumped Ship to Verboten Competitor
Litigator of the Week: After Years Repping Prenatal Testing Client, First-Time First Chair Lands a $57M Patent Damages Verdict
Trending Stories
- 1GE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
- 2As Political Extremism Rises, is Voter Data the Next Privacy Frontier?
- 3So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 4US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 5From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250