Willkie's Gordon Caplan Makes Boston Court Appearance to Face College Admissions Charges
Caplan was asked if he understood the charges against him and that he faced a maximum term of 20 years behind bars. He said “yes, Your Honor” to each question.
April 03, 2019 at 03:53 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Gordon Caplan, the suspended co-chairman of Willkie Farr & Gallagher, made his first appearance in Boston federal court Wednesday alongside a host of other parents accused of paying bribes to get their kids into top colleges.
Caplan appeared briefly before U.S. Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley of the District of Massachusetts, along with his defense attorney, Joshua Levy of Ropes & Gray. Levy told the judge his client was waiving a preliminary conference. Caplan was asked if he understood the charges against him and that he faced a maximum term of 20 years behind bars; he said “yes, Your Honor” to each question.
About a dozen parents made their initial appearances two by two on Wednesday. All of them, including Caplan, have been charged with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.
Caplan was called at the same time as Lori Loughlin, the actress known for her role on TV's “Full House,” and her husband Mossimo Giannulli, a fashion designer. The couple is represented by Latham & Watkins.
After the appearance, Caplan did not respond to questions from ALM, and his lawyers, Levy and Patrick Smith, declined to comment.
Caplan, whose firm said he has been put on leave and relieved of management responsibilities in the wake of the charges, is among 50 people caught up in the college admissions scandal, which centers on consultant William “Rick” Singer. Prosecutors allege Singer was paid fees to put parents, including Caplan, in touch with corrupt test proctors who would ensure their children did well on the ACT or SAT college admissions exams.
Other parents are alleged to have worked with Singer to pretend their children were high-achieving athletes so that corrupt coaches at several schools could push for them to be recruited. And some are accused of paying Singer to have other people take classes online in place of their children.
Dozens of reporters, photojournalists and cameramen stationed themselves at the front and back doors of the John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse in Boston hours before Wednesday's proceedings were set to start. Most of them were there for Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, an actress on “Desperate Housewives” represented by Foley Hoag, who is also charged in the scheme. Both women were escorted to waiting SUVs.
More than 32 defendants, including Caplan, were charged by complaint and most have yet to be indicted or arraigned. Some are reportedly in talks with prosecutors to plead guilty in exchange for a reduced sentence.
Peter Jan Sartorio, a packaged foods businessman who was one of the parents charged in the bribery scheme, said in a court filing that he planned to plead guilty to an unspecified charge or charges later this month. He is represented by Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, a Boston firm known for white-collar defense work.
One of the defendants who was scheduled to appear Wednesday, Devin Sloane, said in a court filing Tuesday that he and his lawyers “reasonably expect” to reach a deal with prosecutors. Sloane, a Los Angeles man said by the government to run a company providing drinking water and wastewater systems, is represented by lawyers from Greenberg Traurig, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez.
Also scheduled to appear Wednesday were Jane Buckingham, represented by Goodwin Procter; Manuel Henriquez, represented by Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, and his wife Elizabeth Henriquez, represented by Ropes & Gray; Bruce Isackson, represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; and Toby MacFarlane, repped by Arguedas, Cassman, Headley & Goldman.
Many parents, including Caplan, are said by prosecutors to have been caught on a wiretap, or in conversations that Singer recorded, discussing the details of the alleged schemes. Caplan is quoted in court papers as saying that the scheme is “a bit weird” and expresses concerns about being caught, but ultimately goes along.
“To be honest, I'm not worried about the moral issue here,” Caplan is quoted as saying. “I'm worried about the, if [my daughter] is caught doing that, you know, she's finished.”
Several of the country's top law firms, as well as specialist boutiques and solo practitioners, have flocked to Boston in recent days as wave after wave of defendants made their initial appearances. Ropes & Gray has entered appearances on behalf of at least three defendants, and some 15 other Big Law firms have appeared, such as White & Case; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; and Covington & Burling.
Other attorneys and firms to have shown up on the docket as defense counsel include Pierce Bainbridge, Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, Miner Orkand Siddall and Martin G. Weinberg.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250