Supporters Rally for Texas Judge Who Mistakenly Resigned on Facebook
The very odd story of Judge Bill McLeod of Houston unfolded on April Fools' Day. It has since caught the attention of media far and wide and now it's making ripples in social media that are bubbling up in the real world.
April 03, 2019 at 04:10 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
By far he's not the first judge to get on trouble on social media, but Judge Bill McLeod of Houston certainly pulled a number on himself by resigning from his bench by accident through a Facebook post.
When McLeod, judge of Harris County's Civil Court-at-Law No. 4, wrote about his aspirations to run someday for the Texas Supreme Court, he apparently did not know the Texas Constitution states that judges who announce they're running for another office effectively have resigned from their current position.
The very odd story, which unfolded on April Fools' Day, caught the attention of media far and wide and now it's making ripples in social media that are bubbling up in the real world.
After someone pointed out the faux pas, McLeod yet again took to Facebook for a live streaming video on March 31 begging his supporters to come to his aid.
“I am in dire need of people's support. [Harris County Attorney] Vince Ryan is trying to throw me off my bench because of this potential violation of the Texas Constitution by making a potential announcement for running for another office. I have no intention of running for the other office,” said a teary eyed McLeod in the video, which asked people to call the Harris County Commissioners Court in advance of an April 9 meeting to decide the matter.
Later, McLeod wrote in comments that he wishes for the commissioners to allow him to stay in office until he can re-run for his bench in a special election in 2020.
Reacting on Facebook, his supporters began commenting and sharing two images listing phone numbers for commissioners and McLeod's accomplishments in office, and called April 9 a “day of action.” Supporters used the hashtag “IStandWithMcLeod.”
Since the incident started, many supporters have posted words of encouragement, but not all are for the judge. Some are saying a judge who doesn't know the Texas Constitution should not be on the bench, for example.
McLeod didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment.
Harris County First Assistant Attorney Robert Soard said it's not the office's job to get McLeod off the bench. Rather, as the lawyer for the county, the office must advise the commissioners about what McLeod did and what the Texas Constitution says about it.
“It's our opinion–it's not a secret about that–that Judge McLeod has resigned from office with his actions. Commissioners could find a replacement, or allow Judge McLeod to stay over in a holdover position for quite a long time, if that is what they have chosen,” Soard said. “It's a decision for the court members to make.”
Meanwhile, here are some examples of how the discussion is shaping up on Facebook.
- “I can think of 647,502 reasons why Judge Bill McLeod needs to stay in that seat. That was the number of Harris County voters (including me) who wanted him on that bench for his full term of office.” – Monica Roberts.
- “If he doesn't even know the Texas state constitution how can he be an effective judge? It begs the question, does he even know the US constitution?” – Walter Vanhorn.
- “He has certainly been a great friend to all of us and we want to return the favor. We [heart emoji] you Brotha Bill and we got your back, front, side, top and bottom.” – Sharon Laverne Fuller.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Simpson Thacher and ACLU Team To Challenge Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
A Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Even With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250