Supporters Rally for Texas Judge Who Mistakenly Resigned on Facebook
The very odd story of Judge Bill McLeod of Houston unfolded on April Fools' Day. It has since caught the attention of media far and wide and now it's making ripples in social media that are bubbling up in the real world.
April 03, 2019 at 04:10 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
By far he's not the first judge to get on trouble on social media, but Judge Bill McLeod of Houston certainly pulled a number on himself by resigning from his bench by accident through a Facebook post.
When McLeod, judge of Harris County's Civil Court-at-Law No. 4, wrote about his aspirations to run someday for the Texas Supreme Court, he apparently did not know the Texas Constitution states that judges who announce they're running for another office effectively have resigned from their current position.
The very odd story, which unfolded on April Fools' Day, caught the attention of media far and wide and now it's making ripples in social media that are bubbling up in the real world.
After someone pointed out the faux pas, McLeod yet again took to Facebook for a live streaming video on March 31 begging his supporters to come to his aid.
“I am in dire need of people's support. [Harris County Attorney] Vince Ryan is trying to throw me off my bench because of this potential violation of the Texas Constitution by making a potential announcement for running for another office. I have no intention of running for the other office,” said a teary eyed McLeod in the video, which asked people to call the Harris County Commissioners Court in advance of an April 9 meeting to decide the matter.
Later, McLeod wrote in comments that he wishes for the commissioners to allow him to stay in office until he can re-run for his bench in a special election in 2020.
Reacting on Facebook, his supporters began commenting and sharing two images listing phone numbers for commissioners and McLeod's accomplishments in office, and called April 9 a “day of action.” Supporters used the hashtag “IStandWithMcLeod.”
Since the incident started, many supporters have posted words of encouragement, but not all are for the judge. Some are saying a judge who doesn't know the Texas Constitution should not be on the bench, for example.
McLeod didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment.
Harris County First Assistant Attorney Robert Soard said it's not the office's job to get McLeod off the bench. Rather, as the lawyer for the county, the office must advise the commissioners about what McLeod did and what the Texas Constitution says about it.
“It's our opinion–it's not a secret about that–that Judge McLeod has resigned from office with his actions. Commissioners could find a replacement, or allow Judge McLeod to stay over in a holdover position for quite a long time, if that is what they have chosen,” Soard said. “It's a decision for the court members to make.”
Meanwhile, here are some examples of how the discussion is shaping up on Facebook.
- “I can think of 647,502 reasons why Judge Bill McLeod needs to stay in that seat. That was the number of Harris County voters (including me) who wanted him on that bench for his full term of office.” – Monica Roberts.
- “If he doesn't even know the Texas state constitution how can he be an effective judge? It begs the question, does he even know the US constitution?” – Walter Vanhorn.
- “He has certainly been a great friend to all of us and we want to return the favor. We [heart emoji] you Brotha Bill and we got your back, front, side, top and bottom.” – Sharon Laverne Fuller.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Simpson Thacher and ACLU Team To Challenge Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
A Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Even With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250