Texas Judge Who Survived Assassination Attempt Shares Her Ordeal
" I try to find positive things out of it," 390th District Judge Julie Kocurek said. "It's made me as stronger, better person as a whole."
April 12, 2019 at 10:46 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
It's a story well-known to Texas lawyers and judges, but now this Saturday, people nationwide will learn how 390th District Judge Julie Kocurek of Austin survived a horrific shooting by a criminal defendant late at night in 2015.
“I scooted down as far as I could in the seat, and I protected my head with my arm and my hand. I can remember thinking, 'I am going to die in front of my own son,'” Kocurek says in a preview of an upcoming episode of the CBS News 48 Hours series, 'Live to Tell,' which airs April 13.
Watch the preview of 48 Hours, then scroll down for our talk with Kocurek about why she went on 48 Hours, how she's advocating for better judicial security and how her recovery is going.
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Texas Lawyer: Your shooting was very traumatic, and I recall you were declining interview requests in the past. Why did you decide to open up to 48 Hours?
390th District Judge Julie Kocurek: The intent is to help with judicial security and highlight it on a national level and maybe inspire others to make change in a positive way for their judges. The trial is over and 48 Hours had been really persistent since the day it happened, and so eventually, I said I would do it if it was very factual and not sensational. I wanted the focus to be judicial security, and Justice Nathan Hecht, the chief of the Texas Supreme Court, helped me with that. He will be on it, too. I'm hoping other states will see this and do something about their judicial security.
You've done a lot to advance judicial security here in Texas. In fact, there's a law called the Judge Julie Kocurek Judicial and Courthouse Security Act of 2017. Can you tell me your role in that?
Kocurek: Four months after my incident, Justice Hecht called me and I went to his office, and we discussed all the issues I had run into. He said he's been trying to push a judicial security law since 2005 and he thought my incident would push it on through. He asked if I was willing to act. My son testified before the senate, and myself.
I was there on the day in 2016 that you returned to your bench in the 390th District Court. You were still wearing an arm brace and doing physical therapy. How have you recovered from your physical injuries since then?
Kocurek: I've lost a finger—my index finger—and my whole left arm is numb, but I can use it. I'm determined to get as much use out of it as possible. I'm lucky to have an arm. I'm lucky to have a life. It's a small price to pay.
I can't imagine the trauma emotionally and psychologically. How are you doing with that recovery?
Kocurek: Once this happened, I felt I was not going to get on the bench until I had undergone some therapy. Doctors and psychologists recommended a rapid eye-movement therapy. I did it for three years, up until the trial. At first I didn't know what it was–it sounded like hocus pocus to me–but it works, and there's concrete evidence. All of us are doing better. I am presiding over a murder case now, amazingly. In the beginning, I thought, 'How am I ever going to do my job again?' But with proper mental health treatment, it was possible. I try to find positive things out of it. It's made me as stronger, better person as a whole.
Read Texas Lawyer's coverage of Kocurek's shooting.
- District Judge Injured in Assassination Attempt
- Police Reveal Details, Seize Evidence in Judge Shooting Case
- 390th District Judge Julie Kocurek Resumes Bench After Assassination Attempt
- Three Indicted for Racketeering Fraud in Connection With Attempted Murder of Judge Kocurek
- Judge Kocurek Testifies Before the Senate State Affairs Committee to Support Security for Texas Jurists
- Houston Man Gets Life in Prison for Scheme Involving Attempted Murder of Austin Judge
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Simpson Thacher and ACLU Team To Challenge Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
A Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Even With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250