Lyft Sued for Defective App Design Following Crash That Injured Pedestrian
The South Florida lawsuit seeks to hold the ride-hailing company liable for a crash that allegedly occurred because a Lyft driver was looking at the Lyft app.
April 13, 2019 at 01:00 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legal Tech News
A South Florida lawsuit has accused ride-sharing company Lyft Inc. of operating an “unreasonably dangerous” app that puts the public at risk.
The complaint filed Thursday in Palm Beach Circuit Court names the San Francisco-based company as a defendant, alongside its subsidiary Lyft Florida Inc., Lyft driver Wilky Ilet and rental car company The Hertz Corp., which partners with Lyft.
The plaintiff is Palm Beach County resident Teresa Brookes, who suffered extensive injuries, including brain trauma, after the Lyft driver struck her as she crossed State Road A1A on Jan. 4.
According to plaintiffs counsel, Domnick Cunningham & Whalen shareholder Jeanmarie Whalen, Brookes was leaving work at The Breakers Palm Beach Resort at the time of the crash. Whalen said the incident was caused because the driver who hit Brookes was distracted by the Lyft app.
“These drivers are required to constantly monitor that app in order to obtain rides and generate revenue for Lyft, and in this instance, for Hertz as well,” the Palm Beach Gardens attorney said.
The vehicle involved in the crash, a 2017 Kia Optima, was part of the Lyft Express Drive initiative. The program is a partnership between Hertz and Lyft, and allows Lyft drivers to rent vehicles to pick up passengers.
The seven-count complaint alleges negligence against all defendants; and direct negligence, negligent hiring of an independent contractor, strict liability defective design, and direct negligence for negligent design of their app against the two companies.
|Read the complaint: [falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
“The general public is put at substantial risk by the use of Lyft,” Whalen said, calling Lyft's business model “inherently dangerous.”
“The app requires constant monitoring; the driver has to respond in a short period of time to any request,” she said. “That requires drivers to take their eyes off the road. That is the essence of distracted driving.”
Neither Lyft nor Hertz responded to requests for comment.
Whalen said her client “has completely lost all independence of life” due to injuries.
“She was hospitalized for over a month post-crash, and since that time she's been under 24-hour aid and attendant care,” the attorney said. Whalen said Brookes is no longer in intensive care but still requires treatment.
“She's suffered a severe brain injury, so she is going to occupational therapy, physical therapy and is still under the care of a host of specialists,” Whalen said. “Her days are [spent] trying to rehabilitate to whatever level she can ultimately achieve.”
“Sometimes there's a lag between the law and technology … and it takes time for these cases to make their way through the court system,” Whalen added. “Lyft should have known their app would have caused distracted and inattentive driving. Through this lawsuit we are hoping to affect positive change that will force Lyft and other ride-sharing companies to make their application safer, their procedures safer, put safer drivers on the road, and to make sure the drivers they put on the road are using apps … that do not endanger the public.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: Rolling Back Elon Musk's $56B Tesla Compensation Package
Litigators of the Week: Quinn Emanuel Slashes $137M Racial Discrimination Verdict Against Tesla by Nearly 98%
Litigators of the Week: Defense Verdict Secured By Quinn Emanuel in Multibillion Securities Trial Over Musk's Go-Private Tweets
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250