Press 1 to Say Thank You
Here's a verdict to applaud: A federal jury in Oregon last week slapped a robocaller with a penalty of up to $925 million for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
April 18, 2019 at 01:45 PM
2 minute read
Here's a verdict to applaud: A federal jury in Oregon last week slapped a robocaller with a penalty of up to $925 million for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
ViSalus, a multi-level marketing company that sells weight loss products and dietary supplements, got hit with a class action for making thousands of illegal telemarking calls featuring prerecorded or artificial voices and disregarding the Do Not Call registry.
“[O]nce an individual found themselves in the unfortunate position of being on ViSalus's contact lists, it was literally impossible to avoid getting called. Ultimately, ViSalus ended up calling thousands of people who did not want to be contacted and who repeatedly requested that the calls cease,” wrote plaintiffs counsel from Forum Law Group and Edelson PC. The plaintiffs were also represented by Dovel & Luner.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act provides statutory damages of up to $500 per call for using a prerecorded message or artificial voice without prior express written consent from the recipient or for violating the Do Not Call registry.
With surprising precision, the jury found ViSalus made 1,850,426 illegal calls. Which at $500 a call, adds up fast.
ViSalus was represented by Quarles & Brady and Miller Nash Graham & Dunn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland and Quinn Emanuel Spar Over Disclosure of Litigation Funder Contracts In Patent Suit Against Google
Daily Dicta: Ooh Burn. US Judge Roasts Suit over Sunscreen in Win for Jenner & Block
Delaware AG Sues to Shut Down Four Companies Linked to Backpage.com Sex Trafficking
4 minute readCanada Dry Maker Can't Shake 'Made From Real Ginger' Suit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250