Conservative Big Law Partners Raise Specter of Trump Impeachment
Signatories on the new statement include Big Law attorneys Peter Keisler of Sidley Austin; King & Spalding's Marisa Maleck; and John Bellinger III of Arnold & Porter.
April 24, 2019 at 03:19 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A new statement from Checks & Balances, a group of high-profile conservative lawyers, is urging Congress to “conduct further investigation” into behavior detailed in the Mueller report that is “starkly inconsistent with the president's constitutional duty to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed.'''
The 11 signatories of the statement posted Tuesday included several Big Law attorneys: Peter Keisler of Sidley Austin; King & Spalding's Marisa Maleck, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas; and John Bellinger III of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer. The letter came with a disclaimer: “Each of us speaks and acts solely in our individual capacities, and our views should not be attributed to any organization we may be affiliated with.”
Also on the list of signers was retired Jones Day partner Donald Ayer; Jonathan Adler, professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, and George Conway III, of counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and a persistent President Donald Trump critic whose wife is Kellyanne Conway, a close adviser to Trump.
Stuart Gerson, a Justice Department official under President George H.W. Bush, a member of Becker Epstein & Green, and a co-author of the statement, said Wednesday that the group is “not urging” impeachment as such, but “our view is more like, if something is to be done about it, here are the facts.”
The lawyers wrote, “We call on Congress to conduct robust, bipartisan oversight to ensure that the threats posed by ongoing foreign malign activities are addressed as matters of the highest priority as we increasingly near the 2020 election.”
In addition, they said, “We believe the framers of the Constitution would have viewed the totality of this conduct as evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors. Accordingly, Congress, which carries its own constitutional oversight responsibilities, should conduct further investigation.”
Asked if the signers' stance might get them in trouble professionally, Gerson said that if anything, members of the group are “being rewarded” for speaking out. Administration officials, other lawyers and even some judges have contacted and applauded the members of the group confidentially, urging them to continue to advocate for the rule of law, he said.
Trump has rebuffed the rising dialogue about impeachment. “If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court,” Trump said Wednesday. He did not articulate what action he would take, if any, if House Democrats did begin impeachment proceedings.
Members of Checks & Balances are not filing amicus briefs as a group, but some members, including Keisler, have appeared on briefs that take positions against the Trump administration. Keisler and fellow Sidley partner Carter Phillips were amicus parties on a brief filed Tuesday in California challenging the Trump administration's use of a national emergency declaration to fund a border wall to which Congress has not allotted any funding.
Ayer, Gerson and Paul Rosenzweig, formerly senior counsel to Kenneth Starr in the Whitewater investigation, said in an op-ed Wednesday at USA Today that “Mueller's report convincingly demonstrates systematic actions by the president to obstruct an ongoing criminal investigation, irrespective of whether a sitting president can be indicted.
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Last year, Maleck, the King & Spalding associate in Washington, appeared on an MSNBC program to talk about her position as a conservative lawyer who's questioning the president's attacks on constitutional norms.
“What's a little concerning is I do think people look at him and say, well, look at all these judges, we're really shaping the judiciary, let's sort of ignore it, he's just sort of blustering. But his words have legal effect,” said Maleck, who clerked for Thomas in the 2015-2016 term. “When he tweets something, people respond. To me, it's not enough to just sort of say we have Justice Kavanaugh, we have Justice Gorsuch so there's nothing to see here. There's plenty of things to see. When you start corroding constitutional norms over time, and switching out dialogue about it, all of a sudden we don't have a functioning democracy any more.”
Read more:
Mueller's Restraint, Barr's Press Conference: Here's What Lawyers Are Saying
How a 'Never Trump' Covington Partner Won, Then Lost, Lucrative ZTE Monitorship
Jessie Liu Withdraws From Consideration for No. 3 Post at Main Justice
'We Must Speak Out': Hundreds of Lawyers Form New Group Assailing Trump
New Conservative Lawyers' Group 'Checks and Balances' Bristles at Trump
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Litigators of the Week: 3 Former SGs Team Up In a Major Opioid Win for Pharmacies at the Ohio Supreme Court
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Litigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250