Sink Sr. v. Sink Jr.: Plaintiffs Lawyer in Charleston Sues Son Over Law Firm's Name
Charleston personal injury lawyer George Sink Sr. has sued his son, George Sink Jr., for trademark infringement for opening his own plaintiffs firm, George Sink II Law Firm.
May 06, 2019 at 05:27 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
South Carolina personal injury attorney George T. Sink named his son after himself—but now he is suing George T. Sink Jr. over their similar law firm names.
Sink Jr. opened George Sink II Law Firm in February, a few days after he was terminated from his father's firm, George Sink, P.A. Injury Lawyers, according to Sink Sr.'s lawsuit in South Carolina federal court.
Sink Sr.'s firm, George Sink, P.A. Injury Lawyers, claims the name of the new firm infringes on the older firm's trademark and could lead to confusion with clients or on Google searches, according to the April 25 complaint.
Sink Sr. said in the complaint that his firm, George Sink, P.A. Injury Lawyers, is one of the “most recognizable law firms in South Carolina.” Since its founding 22 years ago, the firm has grown to 45 lawyers in 13 offices, according to its website, including locations in Savannah and Augusta, Georgia.
Sink Sr. has trademarked “George Sink, P.A. Injury Lawyers” and invested a lot of money in the brand, according to his firm's complaint, which says the firm “advertises heavily” on TV, radio, social media and its website, sinklaw.com.
“The George Sink marks are famous, at least throughout South Carolina and Georgia,” says the suit, which is asking for an injunction to prevent Sink Jr. from using the name “George Sink” for his own plaintiffs firm. The suit is also asking for the cancellation of Sink Jr.'s website domain name, “GeorgeSinkLawFirm.com.”
After the younger Sink launched his firm, Google suspended the website for George Sink, P.A. Personal Injury, the complaint says, over confusion about the two separate business listings for George Sink.
It took the firm two weeks of correspondence with Google to satisfy the tech giant that George Sink, P.A. and George Sink II Law Firm were different entities. During those two weeks, the larger firm was knocked out of search results and lost “more than 600 positive Google reviews,” alleges the complaint, first reported by Myrtle Beach Sun News.
George Sink P.A. Injury Lawyers is suing “to protect consumers of legal services,” said a statement from its lawyers at Moore & Van Allen and Gibbs & Holmes in Charleston.
“The firm has obtained federal registered service marks to clearly indicate to the general public the source of the origin of the legal services the consumer is seeking. The marks exist to protect consumers from the confusion and misdirection caused by infringement,” the statement said.
“The goal is not to keep 'Ted' Sink from practicing law,” the statement continued. “However, when consumers look for George Sink PA Injury Lawyers, they must be confident they will find the firm they seek.”
|'Birth Certificate' Brand
But Sink Jr.'s lawyers from South Carolina firm Bland Richter say he should be able to use his given name for his professional corporation.
George Sink Jr. (Courtesy photo)
“We represent George Sink, Jr. This is the name that appears on his birth certificate, driver's license, Yale undergraduate degree and on his law degree, as well as on his licenses to practice law in South Carolina and Georgia,” said a statement from Eric Bland and Ronnie Richter.
“Whether trademark law permits a father to take back his son's name or restrict his right to practice law is an issue we would forward to litigating through the courts,” the statement concluded.
Sink Jr., also known as Ted, returned to Charleston in 2013 to work in marketing for his father's firm after an 11-year career in advertising at McGarryBowen, BBDO and other firms in New York, according to the complaint and Sink Jr.'s LinkedIn profile.
He went on to become a lawyer, earning a J.D. in 2016 from Charleston School of Law, and then practiced at his father's firm. He is licensed to practice in South Carolina and Georgia.
A current Google search for “George Sink” reveals numerous listings for George Sink, P.A. Injury Law, plus several new links to news stories about the suit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
