Prosecutors Drop Charge Against Vinson & Elkins Practice Leader Stemming from Boat Accident
Douglass McWilliams' attorney disputed the account that the V&E practice leader left the scene of a crash.
May 10, 2019 at 04:45 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Prosecutors dropped a felony charge Tuesday against a Vinson & Elkins practice leader who authorities said abandoned injured passengers after a boating accident on Lake Travis last year.
Authorities said that Douglass McWilliams, head of the equity capital markets practice at Vinson & Elkins in Houston, was at the helm of a boat that crashed into a sandbar on the Austin lake. According to the Austin American-Statesman, McWilliams told his injured passengers that he was going to get help. When McWilliams wasn't seen for several hours, authorities initiated a search of the water that included the use of an Austin police helicopter, according to the Statesman.
Authorities later charged McWilliams with leaving the scene of a crash, a felony in Texas. But McWilliams' attorney, Austin criminal defense lawyer Brian Roark of Botsford & Roark, disputed that account and said that leaving to get help after an accident is ”specifically allowed under Texas law.”
The statement provided by Roark to The American Lawyer last year notes that McWilliams had turned off his boat while it was still running after the crash and evaluated the injuries of his passengers. After being told that there was difficulty in getting a signal to call 911, McWilliams, despite having suffered a dislocated shoulder, left the scene to go find help, according to Roark's account, which noted that the Vinson & Elkins partner had left his cellphone at home.
In an emailed statement to Texas Lawyer following the dismissal of the charges, Roark said: “The Travis County District Attorney's Office has recently completed their review of the facts surrounding the accident and the attempt of a Texas Parks and Wildlife Game Warden to obtain a warrant without approval and based on misleading statements, and leak it to the press. They concluded that the evidence required that the case be dismissed and the dismissal paperwork was recently filed and signed by a Travis County District Judge. The dismissal lists the reason as 'in the interests of justice,' thereby clearing Mr. McWilliams of the false allegation of the Game Warden. Mr. McWilliams would like to thank the prosecutors in Ms. Moore's office for their work and professionalism during this trying time for all involved.”
Matthew Foye, the prosecutor overseeing the case, told the Austin American-Statesman that after a review of the information, he concluded dismissal was appropriate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
Litigators of the Week: Simpson Thacher and ACLU Team To Challenge Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
Trending Stories
- 1High-flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
- 2Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
- 3Deposing Former Mayor Bill de Blasio; Misrepresentations To Induce Investment: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 4Which Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
- 5Two Tesla Shareholder Cases in Del. Chancery Court Consolidated
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250