Tesla's Musk to Rescue Volunteer He Called 'Pedo Guy' on Twitter: You Started It
In their answer to a defamation complaint filed on behalf of British caver Vernon Unsworth, Musk's lawyers argued that Unsworth verbally attacked Musk in the press prior to Musk's now-deleted Tweet.
May 14, 2019 at 01:56 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lawyers for Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk are pushing back against a defamation lawsuit brought by the cave-rescue volunteer Musk called a “pedo guy” on Twitter.
Musk lashed out at Vernon Unsworth on social media last July after both volunteered as part of the rescue of 12 Thai boys and their soccer coach from a flooded cave in Thailand. The caver gave a critical interview to CNN claiming that a submersible tube Musk designed for the rescue was a “PR stunt” prior to Musk's since-deleted Tweet calling him a “pedo guy.”
Unsworth sued Musk last year with counsel from high-profile defamation attorney L. Lin Wood claiming that Musk's Twitter remarks, as well as the tech executive's email exchange with a journalist at BuzzFeed urging an investigation into the caver's background, resulted in “worldwide damage” to his reputation.
Musk's lawyers at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Hueston Hennigan filed their answer to Unsworth's complaint on Tuesday and among their arguments is a classic playground rejoinder: You started it.
“Before Mr. Musk had said anything about Unsworth—or even knew who he was—Mr. Unsworth capped off his attacks on Mr. Musk with the terse suggestion that Mr. Musk take the miniature rescue submarine that he and his engineers had invented and built for the rescue and 'stick it where it hurts' [during the CNN interview],” wrote Musk's lawyers.
Musk's lawyers point out that their client deleted and retracted the “pedo guy” tweet within days of posting it last July. They also contend that Musk's email correspondence with the BuzzFeed reporter was meant to be off-the-record and that it was published “without Mr. Musk's knowledge or approval.” The lawyers, who include Quinn's Alex Spiro and Hueston Hennigan name partner John Hueston, also argue that Unsworth has not suffered reputational harm. They note that in December the queen of England announced that she would be making Unsworth a member of the Order of the British Empire, a chivalrous honor that's a few steps short of knighthood.
“No, this lawsuit is not about restoring anything Mr. Unsworth claims to have lost,” wrote Musk's lawyers. “The formerly unknown Mr. Unsworth remains the utterly undamaged Mr. Unsworth. In reality, this case represents Mr. Unsworth's devious desire to milk the media coverage over what he instigated to reap a financial windfall from Mr. Musk, despite the absence of any injury. Mr. Musk will fight that,” they wrote.
Wood, Unsworth's lawyer, said Tuesday that the filing “makes clear that Musk is incapable of accepting responsibility for his wrongdoing, preferring to blame others.”
“I actually feel sympathy for the SEC and Musk's shareholders,” said Wood via email. “Fortunately, Mr. Unsworth does not have to tolerate Musk's antics and can ask a jury of his peers to teach him a lesson.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
Shareholder Democracy? The Chatter Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Is Spurring Between Lawyers and Clients
6 minute readLitigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: Rolling Back Elon Musk's $56B Tesla Compensation Package
Trending Stories
- 1Big Law Partner Co-Launches Startup Aiming to Transform Fund Formation Process
- 2How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
- 3Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief
- 4Cooley Promotes NY Office Leader to Global Litigation Department Chair
- 5What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250