Tech Company Claims Toyota's Autonomous Driving Features Infringe Its Patents
A new federal complaint alleges that autonomous driving features, such as lane assist and collision avoidance in Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles, are infringing on patents owned by American GNC Corp., a California-based technology company.
May 15, 2019 at 05:49 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
A new federal complaint alleges that autonomous driving features, such as lane assist and collision avoidance in Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles, are infringing on patents owned by a California-based technology company.
The plaintiff, American GNC Corp., invents and licenses technologies such as sensors and gyroscopes used in vehicle navigation and collision avoidance systems. It alleges Toyota Motor Corp. and three of its Texas-based subsidiaries are aware that its vehicles are infringing on patents, yet have not entered an agreement to license the technology. The company raised the claims in a May 14 complaint in American GNC v. Toyota Motor, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Marshall.
“We're just trying to help the true inventors of the technology receive compensation for their inventions,” said Alison Richards of the Global IP Law Group in Chicago, who represents American GNC. “Sometimes in the press, American GNC has been called a patent troll. They're not a patent troll. They're a high-technology company that's done a lot of important work for a lot of entities, including NASA and the Department of Defense.”
Three Toyota subsidiaries based in Plano—Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc.—are defendants along with Japan-based Toyota Motor Corp.
“Toyota has not yet been served with this lawsuit so we have no further comment at this time,” Toyota spokeswoman Karen Nielsen said in an email.
The complaint lists three patents on which Toyota allegedly infringed, involving technology used in autonomous vehicle navigation, for proximity warnings when vehicles get near hazards, and involving a microelectromechanical system to produce accurate signals.
The defendants have known about one of the patents since 2006, and became aware of another patent in 2016, the complaint said. Also, a lawyer for American GNC in March 2018 wrote a letter to a group of Toyota's top executives and general counsel to notify them about the three patents and the ways that American GNC was alleging that Toyota infringed on the patents, according to the plaintiff. In reply, a lawyer for Toyota Motor North America allegedly said the company was investigating the assertions, but American GNC said its attorney didn't hear back from the defendants about the results.
“Toyota has continued to infringe and induce the infringement” of the patents, the complaint said.
Some of the Toyota features that the company alleges infringe its patents include a sensor that is useful for navigation and electronic stability control, for example, in preventing rollovers or skidding in turns. Another is a laser cruise control system that can maintain a set distance between the Toyota vehicle, and the vehicle driving in front of it. Also, a lane-departure assist feature, which tells drivers if they're drifting out of their lane and can steer vehicles back to the center. Finally, Amercian GNC alleges infringement from a precollision system, which measures the position of objects in front of the Toyota, and can automatically brake or notify the driver to do so to stop or mitigate frontal collisions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShareholder Democracy? The Chatter Elon Musk’s Tesla Pay Case Is Spurring Between Lawyers and Clients
6 minute readLitigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: Rolling Back Elon Musk's $56B Tesla Compensation Package
Litigators of the Week: Quinn Emanuel Slashes $137M Racial Discrimination Verdict Against Tesla by Nearly 98%
Trending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250