Daily Dicta: Won't Back Down: Tom Petty's Widow and Daughters Locked in Bitter Estate Fight
Singer Tom Petty's daughters on Wednesday sued his widow, Dana York Petty, for $5 million, claiming self-dealing, theft, and gross mismanagement of his estate.
May 16, 2019 at 12:50 PM
3 minute read
Just about every lawsuit has an element of bitterness or betrayal, but there's nothing like a trusts and estates fight to really drive it home.
The latest: Singer Tom Petty's daughters on Wednesday sued his widow, Dana York Petty, for $5 million, claiming self-dealing, theft, and gross mismanagement of his estate.
They're represented by Venable's Alex Weingarten (who last week filed a suit on behalf of Brooke Shields against a cosmetics maker and several high-end retailers for selling an unauthorized eyebrow pencil, the “Brooke S.”)
Petty's daughters, Adria Robin Petty and Annakim Violette, claim that their father entrusted them along with their step-mother to manage his estate after his death, “with clear instructions that they participate equally in the management,” according to the complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court. “Regrettably, Dana has refused her late husband's instructions and insisted upon competing against plaintiff and misappropriating its business opportunities and assets, all the while continuing to ostensibly serve as a manager of plaintiff.”
It's the latest move in an ongoing fight over Petty's estate—namely his song catalog.
The singer died on October 2, 2017 at age 66 of an accidental overdose of prescription drugs including Fentanyl, oxycodone and generic Xanax. He had recently finished a 53-date tour and his family said he was in pain from a broken hip.
In April, York Petty filed a petition in Los Angeles County Superior Court asking the court to approve the creation of a professionally managed business entity to hold Petty's artistic property. She and her step-daughters disagreed over who to hire to run it.
A key point of contention: the provision in the trust that Petty's widow and daughters have “equal participation in management.”
To the daughters, that means they each get a vote—which would give them a two-thirds majority.
But York Petty argues she is “certain that Tom did not intend that 'equal participation in management' meant empowering Adria and Annakim to join together to disenfranchise petitioner, Tom's widow.”
York Petty is represented by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton's Adam Streisand, who previously represented the widow of The North Face co-founder Douglas Tompkins in a successful fight with her step-daughter over control of Tompkins' estate.
In an email, Streisand called the suit by Petty's daughters “misguided and meritless.”
He continued, “Tom Petty's trust gives his wife Dana sole authority to form a company that will manage his intellectual property once the estate is ready for distribution. Though not required, Dana nevertheless bent over backwards to include the daughters in the process of forming the company.
“When the daughters proved impossible to deal with and were seriously damaging all of Tom's professional relationships, Dana asked for the court's assistance. She's now being sued with ridiculous and false charges when in fact all that has happened is Dana has asked the court to make the determination about the structure of this company.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250