Surmounting Criticism on Abortion Views, Wendy Vitter Becomes Trump's 65th District Judge
Vitter, currently general counsel to the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans, was confirmed 52-45.
May 16, 2019 at 12:48 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The U.S. Senate confirmed Wendy Vitter to a Louisiana federal court seat Thursday, approving a nominee who drew significant opposition from civil rights and abortion rights groups.
Vitter, currently general counsel to the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans, was confirmed 52-45, overcoming criticism of her past views on abortion and an answer she gave at a confirmation hearing last year on a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case. Only one Republican, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, defected from party ranks and opposed Vitter's nomination.
Vitter is the 65th federal trial court judge confirmed under President Donald Trump's administration.
Vitter became a lighting rod among liberals last year after declining to address whether she believed the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1954 desegregation ruling in Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided. Her response came in an exchange with Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, during her confirmation hearing.
“I don't mean to be coy, but I think I get into a difficult area when I start commenting on Supreme Court decisions which are correctly decided and which I may disagree with,” Vitter said, adding that the ruling was “binding” and she would “of course” uphold if it confirmed to the bench.
When she was pressed again for an answer, Vitter explained: “[I]f I start commenting on 'I agree with this case' or 'don't agree with this case,' I think we get into a slippery slope.” Democrats slammed Vitter for the exchange, and a social media clip went viral.
Nearly all of the president's judicial picks have sidestepped Blumenthal's question, declining to endorse the correctness of any high court precedent. Blumenthal also asks nominees about their views on the abortion rights case Roe v. Wade. Still, civil rights groups have begun a pressure campaign to urge senators to reject picks who refuse to answer the question.
Blumenthal accused four nominees of being coached on how to answer his question on Brown after giving similar answers during a hearing in April. That hearing involved nominees Steven Grimberg, Ada Brown, David Novak and Matthew Solomson.
Vitter's nomination also became mired in concerns about her views and past statements on abortion rights. Senate Democrats have all criticized Vitter for her participation on a 2013 panel titled “Abortion Hurts Women's Health,” and for encouraging the distribution of a brochure that linked contraceptives to higher rates of violent death.
The same year, Vitter gave remarks at an anti-Planned Parenthood rally, where she reportedly said it was “the saddest of ironies” that a group that says it promotes women's health also “kill[s] over 150,000 females a year.” Democrats slammed Vitter for those appearances, and for failing to disclose both sets of remarks to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.
Vitter attempted to distance herself from the comments during her confirmation hearing, vowing to “set aside any personal or religious views” on abortion if confirmed. She told lawmakers she was “not a medical professional” and meant to encourage people to seek the advice of their doctors. She said her “150,000 females” comment was a reference to aborted fetuses.
Vitter, who is married to former U.S. Sen. David Vitter, will fill the vacancy left by Judge Helen Ginger Berrigan, who took senior status. She was first nominated to the New Orleans-based U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in January 2018.
Vitter began working for the Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans in 2012, first working as a project director and then as general counsel. Vitter did not practice law between 1997 and 2012, according to her Senate paperwork.
She briefly worked as a New Orleans-based associate attorney at Abbott & Meeks Law Firm from 1992 to 1993. Before that, Vitter worked at the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office, joining them as a law clerk in 1983 and eventually rising to become the office's chief of trials.
Vitter graduated from Sam Houston State University in 1982 and Tulane Law School in 1986.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
'Vision': Judge David Tatel on the Value of Oral Argument and Reading Drafts Aloud
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250