Ex-Big Law Partner Sues Sports Club for $10M After Public Lewdness Charge Dismissed
At the time of the charges, Hammond co-chaired Hughes Hubbard's international practice from New York. He has since left the firm and now lives in Portugal, where he has sought to work as an arbitrator.
May 23, 2019 at 01:47 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
This story has been updated with comment from Equinox.
A former partner at Hughes Hubbard & Reed who was charged last year with masturbating in a steam room has sued Equinox and a former employee, claiming the gym chain violated its own policies and its racy marketing campaigns “emboldened” an employee to make a false misconduct allegation.
Steven Hammond was arrested and charged last year with public lewdness after Equinox staffer Michael Alexander accused him of masturbating in the steam room. Hammond's lawyer said the criminal case against him has since been dismissed.
This week, Hammond brought a defamation lawsuit in Manhattan Supreme Court against Alexander and his former employer for more than $10 million for dragging his name through the mud based on what he said was weak evidence with no investigation.
Hammond's suit also accuses the gym of negligence, saying it was foreseeable that false allegations like Alexander's would result from its use of “hyper-sexualized” marketing campaigns that focus on fit, nearly naked people in sexually suggestive positions. Combined with other factors, like the gym's failure to investigate Alexander's claims before terminating Hammond's membership, the ads allow Equinox to be held liable, Hammond argues.
“Equinox sought to promote an image of its clubs as venues for immoral behavior,” the suit said. “By carelessly and intentionally pursuing its aggressive branding strategy, Equinox foreseeably encouraged third parties, including Alexander, to target Equinox and its members with the very kind of false allegation at the core of plaintiff's injuries.”
Neal Brickman, who represents Hammond in the civil case, said his client beat the criminal charge after “some real credibility issues” surfaced involving Alexander, noting Manhattan prosecutors filed an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal and immediately dismissed the case. A spokeswoman for the Manhattan District Attorney's office said the case is sealed and declined to comment.
At the time of the charges, Hammond co-chaired Hughes Hubbard's international practice from New York. He has since left the firm.
Brickman said Hammond had been contemplating retiring from Hughes Hubbard for some time before he was charged because of a desire to do more work as a neutral without having to worry about conflicts. Brickman said his client left the firm on his own terms and now lives in Portugal, where he has sought to continue working in international arbitration as a neutral.
Asked about the hypersexualized marketing claim, Brickman acknowledged there was no case law directly on point. “Under a negligence theory, I wouldn't say there's a fact pattern that is identical to this, but there are negligence cases that are analogous,” he said.
In addition to seeking damages for defamation and negligence, Hammond also brought claims against Equinox for breach of its membership agreement, for negligent hiring, retention and supervision and against all defendants for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
An Equinox spokeswoman said in a statement, that the firm doesn't comment on litigation, but would “vigorously defend” itself in court. “Equinox believes that this is a dispute purely between two individuals, Mr. Hammond and Mr. Alexander,” the spokeswoman said.
Hammond's suit comes about a week after Alexander sued him for false imprisonment, assault and battery tied to the alleged steam room incident last year.
Marc Held of Held & Hines, a lawyer for Alexander, mentioned the suit in a statement to ALM. Held said Hammond has threatened his client and called the lawyer's own suit “baseless and merely an attempt to intimidate my client and deflect from his own actions.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
- 2US Law Firm Leasing Up Nearly 30% Through Q3, With a Growing Number of Firms Staying in Place
- 3SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
- 4Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 5On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250